Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 30658/18 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12945/87
HADJIANASTASSIOU v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR - 30658/18
Did the grounds of the applicant's appeals to the Supreme Court fall within the scope of Article 432 of the Albanian Code of Criminal Procedure? Did the above court duly reason its decisions in compliance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 252, § 33, and Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, § 61)?. - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR - 30658/18
Did the grounds of the applicant's appeals to the Supreme Court fall within the scope of Article 432 of the Albanian Code of Criminal Procedure? Did the above court duly reason its decisions in compliance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 252, § 33, and Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, § 61)?. - EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
DRIZA c. ALBANIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 30658/18
Did the applicant have a fair hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the Supreme Court's bench impartial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the participation of judges Sh.S., A.Z., E.I., and T.M. consistent with the principle of impartiality (see, mutatis mutandis, Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 74, ECHR 2007 XII)?.