Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAHAETTIN UZAN v. TURKEY

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  UZAN v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

  DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 30836/07

  He has not, however, submitted any evidence to demonstrate that the relevant legal framework, with the safeguards noted in paragraphs 61-65 above, failed to provide adequate guarantees to exclude any objective doubt as to the absence of inappropriate pressure by the executive on the judges of the Istanbul 8th Assize Court in the performance of their judicial duties (compare Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; and contrast Sacilor-Lormines, cited above, § 67).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 65411/01

  SACILOR LORMINES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 30836/07

  As regards the requirement of impartiality, the Court has established that there are two aspects to that requirement: first, the tribunal must be subjectively free of personal prejudice or bias; secondly, it must also be impartial from an objective viewpoint, that is, it must offer sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411/01, § 60, ECHR 2006-XIII).
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 8162/13

  BIAGIOLI v. SAN MARINO

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 30836/07

  The Court considers, in the light of the foregoing, that there is no evidence in the case file to hold that the establishment of the Istanbul 8th Assize Court entailed an undue interference with the judiciary on the part of the executive that undermined the purpose of the right to a "tribunal established by law" within the meaning of the Convention (see, for instance, Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no. 8162/13, § 79, ECHR 8 July 2014, and Pasquini v. San Marino, no. 50956/16, § 110, 2 May 2019; see also the findings confirming the independence and impartiality of that court from the executive in paragraphs 61-68 below).
• EGMR - 34179/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 30836/07

  It notes in this connection that in determining whether a body could be considered "independent", regard must be had to such factors as the manner of appointment of the body's members, the duration of their term of office, the existence of guarantees against outside pressures and the question whether the body presents an appearance of independence (see Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 49, ECHR 2013 (extracts), with further references therein).
• EGMR, 02.05.2019 - 50956/16

  PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 30836/07

  The Court considers, in the light of the foregoing, that there is no evidence in the case file to hold that the establishment of the Istanbul 8th Assize Court entailed an undue interference with the judiciary on the part of the executive that undermined the purpose of the right to a "tribunal established by law" within the meaning of the Convention (see, for instance, Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no. 8162/13, § 79, ECHR 8 July 2014, and Pasquini v. San Marino, no. 50956/16, § 110, 2 May 2019; see also the findings confirming the independence and impartiality of that court from the executive in paragraphs 61-68 below).

• EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 47621/13

  Impfpflicht in Tschechien: Impflicht für Kinder ist keine …

  8675/15 and 8697/15, §§ 225, 228, 13 February 2020; Bahaettin Uzan v. Turkey, no. 30836/07, §§ 53-55, 24 November 2020; and L.B. v. Hungary, no. 36345/16, § 57, 12 January 2021).