Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.02.2020 - 32811/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,2865) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOMOLOV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-general (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KOMOLOV v. RUSSIA
Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 2 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 28975/05
KHLYUSTOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2020 - 32811/17
Relying on principles which are well-established in its case-law (see, among numerous other authorities, Gochev v. Bulgaria, no. 34383/03, §§ 49-50, 26 November 2009; Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975/05, § 91, 11 July 2013; and Battista v. Italy, no. 43978/09, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2014), the Court will examine the question whether a fair balance has been struck between the applicant's right to leave his country guaranteed by Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention and the creditor's right to obtain the enforcement of the judgment debt. - EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 34383/03
GOCHEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2020 - 32811/17
Relying on principles which are well-established in its case-law (see, among numerous other authorities, Gochev v. Bulgaria, no. 34383/03, §§ 49-50, 26 November 2009; Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975/05, § 91, 11 July 2013; and Battista v. Italy, no. 43978/09, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2014), the Court will examine the question whether a fair balance has been struck between the applicant's right to leave his country guaranteed by Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention and the creditor's right to obtain the enforcement of the judgment debt.