Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 32863/21 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
WISNIEWSKA v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR - 32863/21
Has there been an interference with the applicant's peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? If so, was that interference necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties? In particular, was that interference in accordance with the law? Did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Yasar v. Romania, no. 64863/13, 26 November 2019; Lachikhina v. Russia, no. 38783/07, 10 October 2017; Dzinic v. Croatia, no. 38359/13, 17 May 2016; Hábenczius v. Hungary, no. 44473/06, 21 October 2014; JGK Statyba Ltd and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania, no. 3330/12, 5 November 2013; Waldemar Nowakowski v. Poland, no. 55167/11, 24 July 2012; and AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108)?.