Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YURIY KOVAL v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YURIY KOVAL v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and the conduct of the competent authorities (see, for example, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 56660/12

  KORNEYKOVA AND KORNEYKOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  There is no indication that the applicant was particularly vulnerable, leaving aside the element of vulnerability inherent in the very fact of his detention (contrast, for example, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 46, ECHR 2002-IX; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, § 159, 15 May 2012; Ilievska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 20136/11, § 61, 7 May 2015; Korneykova and Korneykov v. Ukraine, no. 56660/12, § 115, 24 March 2016; and Zherdev v. Ukraine, no. 34015/07, § 91, 27 April 2017, which concerned applicants who were seriously ill, disabled or, in the last two cases, a woman in labour and a minor left in a state of undress on police premises respectively).
• EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02

  ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  As far as the applicant's handcuffing in the course of his transportation is concerned, there was no element of public exposure or humiliation in it (contrast, for example, Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 45, 6 March 2007, and Gorodnitchev v. Russia, no. 52058/99, § 108, 24 May 2007).

 
• EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 34015/07

  ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  There is no indication that the applicant was particularly vulnerable, leaving aside the element of vulnerability inherent in the very fact of his detention (contrast, for example, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 46, ECHR 2002-IX; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, § 159, 15 May 2012; Ilievska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 20136/11, § 61, 7 May 2015; Korneykova and Korneykov v. Ukraine, no. 56660/12, § 115, 24 March 2016; and Zherdev v. Ukraine, no. 34015/07, § 91, 27 April 2017, which concerned applicants who were seriously ill, disabled or, in the last two cases, a woman in labour and a minor left in a state of undress on police premises respectively).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91

  KAMPANIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  The opportunity for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty (see Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, § 47, Series A no. 318-B).
• EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 20136/11

  ILIEVSKA v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  There is no indication that the applicant was particularly vulnerable, leaving aside the element of vulnerability inherent in the very fact of his detention (contrast, for example, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 46, ECHR 2002-IX; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, § 159, 15 May 2012; Ilievska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 20136/11, § 61, 7 May 2015; Korneykova and Korneykov v. Ukraine, no. 56660/12, § 115, 24 March 2016; and Zherdev v. Ukraine, no. 34015/07, § 91, 27 April 2017, which concerned applicants who were seriously ill, disabled or, in the last two cases, a woman in labour and a minor left in a state of undress on police premises respectively).