Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BILAL AKYILDIZ v. TURKEY

  No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AKYILDIZ c. TURQUIE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 59133/11

  FERNANDES PEDROSO c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 36897/07

  While it is true that the DNA test revealed that the applicant was not responsible for the sexual assaults (see paragraph 6 above), it had no effect as regards the attempted abductions of the children, since during the identification parade organised during the applicant's time in police custody, the two victims and the witness had identified the applicant as the perpetrator of the abduction attempts (compare with Fernandes Pedroso v. Portugal, no. 59133/11, § 102, 12 June 2018, where the applicant complained in particular that he had been identified from a photograph, in the absence of an identification parade).
• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 37555/97

  O'HARA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 36897/07

  Accordingly, having regard to the particular nature of the facts giving rise to the applicant's deprivation of liberty, the nature of the alleged offences, and the information in the file, the Court considers that the applicant's arrest and detention were based on sufficient evidence to persuade a neutral and objective observer that the applicant could have committed the offence charged (see Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 32, Series A no. 182, and O"Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555/97, § 34, ECHR 2001 X).

• EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 77805/14

  SHIPOVIKJ v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  In doing so they described the circumstances surrounding the applicants" arrest and the extension of their pre-trial detention (see, conversely, Bilal Akyildiz v. Turkey, no. 36897/07, §§ 24 and 41, 15 September 2020, in which the domestic courts merely relied on the applicant's acquittal).