Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 06.11.2001 - 53430/99

  FEDERATION CHRETIENNE DES TEMOINS DE JEHOVAH DE FRANCE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Being an umbrella organisation of local religious associations of Vaishnavism, it had not been directly and immediately affected by the project (they referred to Fédération chrétienne des témoins de Jéhovah de France v. France (dec.), no. 53430/99, ECHR 2001-XI).
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 47429/09

  PEROVY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The Court reiterates that the State cannot be held responsible for failure to offer protection against acts by private individuals unless they exercise their right to freedom of expression in a manner causing serious prejudice to the enjoyment by the applicant of another right protected by the Convention (see Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420/10 and 3 others, § 106, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Perovy v. Russia, no. 47429/09, § 75, 20 October 2020).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).

 
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Article 9 lists a number of forms which manifestation of one's religion or belief may take, namely, worship, teaching, practice and observance (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The standing of associations to bring legal proceedings in defence of their members" interests has been recognised in the legislation of many member States and upheld by the Court (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-III, and Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 81, 14 January 2020).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The standing of associations to bring legal proceedings in defence of their members" interests has been recognised in the legislation of many member States and upheld by the Court (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-III, and Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 81, 14 January 2020).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  Lacking that essential information about the domestic remedy, the Court rejects the Government's plea of non-exhaustion for being unsubstantiated (see Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 205, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 58911/00

  Rechtssache L. e.V. u.a gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The Court has also acknowledged that, even where applicants have not been personally targeted by hostile speech, they may be considered "victims" in the sense of being affected by remarks and expressions disparaging the religious movement or ethnic group to which they belonged (see Leela Förderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911/00, §§ 8 and 79, 6 November 2008, and Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 53, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

  KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  The action plan provided for the participation of State officials, educators, and representatives of "traditional denominations" (as listed in the Preamble to the Religions Act, see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 49, ECHR 2009).

• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 29443/20

  CONSTANTIN-LUCIAN SPÎNU c. ROUMANIE

  Cette liberté figure, dans sa dimension religieuse, parmi les éléments les plus essentiels de l'identité des croyants et de leur conception de la vie, mais elle est aussi un bien précieux pour les athées, les agnostiques, les sceptiques ou les indifférents (Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov c. Russie, no 37477/11, § 37, 23 novembre 2021).
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 56862/15

  TONCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  Ainsi, dans deux arrêts plus récents, Leela Förderkreis e.V. et autres (précité) et Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov c. Russie (no 37477/11, 23 novembre 2021), la Cour a considéré que l'évocation en termes hostiles ou péjoratifs d'une communauté religieuse dans des documents émis par des autorités publiques, dans la mesure où elle était susceptible d'avoir des conséquences négatives sur l'exercice par ses membres de leur liberté de religion, suffisait à constituer une atteinte aux droits garantis par l'article 9 de la Convention (Leela Förderkreis e.V. et autres, précité, § 84, et Centre des sociétés pour la conscience de Krishna en Russie et Frolov, précité, § 38).