Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.09.2022 - 37574/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,23477) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
P.H. v. SLOVAKIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 31007/96
MUHADRI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2022 - 37574/19
According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31007/96, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2000-XI, with further references).
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 2264/12
AINIS AND OTHERS v. ITALY
However, the Court has held that in some contexts, such as detention in police stations, even where it is not established that the authorities knew or ought to have known about any such risk, there are certain basic precautions which police officers should be expected to take in all cases in order to minimise any potential risk to the health and well-being of the arrested person (see Daraibou, cited above, § 84; Fanziyeva v. Russia, no. 41675/08, § 48, 18 June 2015; Eremiásová and Pechová, cited above, § 110; and, mutatis mutandis, Mizigárová, cited above, § 89, and P.H. v. Slovakia, no. 37574/19, § 113, 8 September 2022). - EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 31975/19
KOVÁCOVÁ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
As there is no appearance of any ill-treatment in relation to these applicants, there is no question of discrimination being the reason for it (see M.B. and Others v. Slovakia, no. 45322/17, § 104, 1 April 2021, and P.H. v. Slovakia, no. 37574/19, § 119, 8 September 2022).