Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 37735/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,37710
EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 37735/09 (https://dejure.org/2019,37710)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.11.2019 - 37735/09 (https://dejure.org/2019,37710)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. November 2019 - 37735/09 (https://dejure.org/2019,37710)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,37710) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    A v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 37735/09
    That investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

    GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 37735/09
    The Court has previously found in the case of Gutsanovi that the possible presence of children, whose young age makes them psychologically vulnerable, at the scene of an arrest is a factor to be taken into consideration in planning and carrying out this kind of operation (see Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 132, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 37735/09
    However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 6749/22

    GRGICIN v. CROATIA

    As regards the second applicant 20. The Court has previously found that the possible presence of children, whose young age makes them psychologically vulnerable, at the scene of an arrest is a factor to be taken into consideration in planning and carrying out this kind of operation (see Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 132, ECHR 2013 (extracts), where children witnessed their father's arrest during a police operation in the early hours of the morning involving special agents wearing masks; A v. Russia, no. 37735/09, § 56, 12 November 2019, where a nine-year-old child witnessed a violent arrest of her father who had put up no resistance, and Dokukiny v. Russia, no. 1223/12, §§ 28-29, 24 May 2022, where a four-year-old child witnesses her father's arrest and sustained injuries by the police during the event).
  • EGMR, 24.05.2022 - 1223/12

    DOKUKINY v. RUSSIA

    The Court notes that the police paid no heed to her presence and did not take her interests into consideration, as they should have, in deciding on and implementing the measure of restraint in respect of her father, all the more so because the measure was not shown to have been necessary (see A v. Russia, no. 37735/09, §§ 67-68, 12 November 2019, and Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 132, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht