Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 37) Striking out applications-general;(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 57675/09

  ZILINSKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  Among the matters which the Court takes into account when assessing compensation are pecuniary damage, which is the loss actually suffered as a direct result of an alleged violation, and non-pecuniary damage, which is the anxiety, inconvenience, uncertainty and other non-pecuniary prejudice caused by the violation (see Zilinskiene v. Lithuania, no. 57675/09, § 60, 1 December 2015).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely, or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make an overall assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 42461/13

  KARÁCSONY ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  42461/13 and 44357/13, § 30, ECHR 2016 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 37683/97

  IAN EDGAR (LIVERPOOL) LIMITED contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  In the context of businesses operating under a legal framework that was essentially stable for more than ten years (see paragraph 9 above), such short transitory periods can hardly be regarded as sufficient (compare and contrast Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000, and C.A. Zrt.
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14556/89

  PAPAMICHALOPOULOS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  Whilst it is possible that in certain circumstances there may be a de facto expropriation of possessions even without any formal alienation, on the grounds that property has become wholly unusable (see, for example, Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, §§ 43-45, Series A no. 260-B), the present application does not disclose any such circumstances since the assets in question, while losing their economic value in terms of their primary purpose, could still be sold for parts.
• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  As was pointed out in James and Others v. the United Kingdom (21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98), the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 has to be construed in the light of the general principle set out in the first sentence of that provision.
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  Consequently, there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 11599/14

  C.A. ZRT. AND T.R. v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  11599/14 and 11602/14, § 36, 1 September 2020, where progressively more restrictive legislation over a long period foreshadowed the possibility of a ban).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14

  In addition, in order for an applicant to be able to claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention, there must be a sufficiently direct link between the applicant and the harm which they consider they have sustained on account of the alleged violation (see, among other authorities, Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III, with further references).

• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 22716/12

  ANDRZEJ RUCI?ƒSKI v. POLAND

  The Court has also accepted that there was control of the use of property where the applicant company, having lost opportunities on the market, had suffered a decrease in its enterprise value (see Könyv-Tár Kft and Others v. Hungary, no. 21623/13, § 43, 16 October 2018, in relation to a decrease of equity value following the creation of a State monopoly in the schoolbook distribution market, and Pannon Plakát Kft and Others v. Hungary, no. 39859/14, §§ 44 and 46, 6 December 2022, in relation to a decrease in enterprise value of the company and the partial loss of economic value of the company's inflexible and non-variable assets due to statutory restrictions on the company's activity (roadside advertising hoardings) for which the assets in question had been used.
• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56903/10

  BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. UKRAINE

  The Court reiterates that when assessing compensation it takes into account pecuniary damage, which is the loss actually suffered as a direct result of an alleged violation (Pannon Plakát Kft and Others v. Hungary, no. 39859/14, § 68, 6 December 2022).