Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M.L. v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
M.L. v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (35)
- EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 35599/20
JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
However, they failed to explain how it could have specifically remedied the applicant's grievances under Article 8 of the Convention, in the sense of remedying the impugned state of affairs directly and providing her with the requisite redress for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 77, and Juszczyszyn v. Poland, no. 35599/20, § 241, 6 October 2022).We further note, in this context, that there are no similarities between the instant case and the cases of Juszczyszyn v. Poland (no. 35599/20, 6 October 2022) and Tuleya v. Poland (nos. 21181/19 and 51751/20, 6 July 2023), mentioned in the reasoning (see paragraph 167 of the judgment).
- EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
In that regard, they referred to the Court's case-law on the question of the beginning of life and protection of a foetus (see X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8416/79, Commission decision of 13 May 1980, DR 19, p. 244; H. v. Norway no. 17004/90, Commission decision of 19 May 1992, DR 73, p. 155; Boso v. Italy, no. 50490/99, ECHR 2002-VII; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, ECHR 2004-VIII; and A, B and C v. Ireland, cited above, § 222).Since the rights claimed on behalf of the foetus and those of the mother are inextricably interconnected (see the review of the Convention case-law at paragraphs 75-80 in [Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, ECHR 2004-VIII]), the margin of appreciation accorded to a State's protection of the unborn necessarily translates into a margin of appreciation for that State as to how it balances the conflicting rights of the mother.
- EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 21181/19
TULEYA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
z o.o., did not concern an individual decision issued in breach of the right to a "tribunal established by law" under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (compare Juszczyszyn, cited above, §§ 216 and 265, and Tuleya v. Poland, nos. 21181/19 and 51751/20, §§ 348 and 439, 6 July 2023).We further note, in this context, that there are no similarities between the instant case and the cases of Juszczyszyn v. Poland (no. 35599/20, 6 October 2022) and Tuleya v. Poland (nos. 21181/19 and 51751/20, 6 July 2023), mentioned in the reasoning (see paragraph 167 of the judgment).
- EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 27617/04
R.R. ./. Polen
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
In their view, the case should be distinguished from R.R. v. Poland (no. 27617/04, §§ 159-160, ECHR 2011 (extracts)), in which the Court found that the applicant's suffering, caused by the doctors' intentional failure to provide timely prenatal examination that would have allowed her to take a decision as to whether to continue or terminate her pregnancy, had reached the minimum threshold of severity under Article 3 of the Convention.The Court's case-law expressly acknowledges the vulnerable situation in which a woman is placed when learning that the foetus is affected by a malformation (see R.R. v. Poland, no. 27617/04, § 159, 26 May 2011).
- EGMR, 22.12.2015 - 28601/11
G.S.B. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
The Court has previously largely disregarded the kind of procedure leading to the enactment of a specific law relied on in support of an interference with a right secured under the Convention, the only limit being arbitrariness (see G. S. B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601/11, § 72, 22 December 2015).The Court's approach was also explained in G.S.B. v. Switzerland (no. 28601/11, § 72, 22 December 2015) in the following terms:.
- EGMR, 07.05.2021 - 4907/18
XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. - Unabhängigkeit der polnischen Gerichte
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
z o.o. v. Poland (no. 4907/18, §§ 4-63, 7 May 2021).The majority state the following: "[the Court] has no doubt that the Constitutional Court should be regarded as a "tribunal' within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland, no. 4907/18, § 194, 7 May 2021)" (see paragraph 163 of the judgment).
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
This is all the more so since the Statute of the Council of Europe refers to the rule of law in two places: firstly in the Preamble, where the signatory Governments affirm their devotion to this principle, and secondly in Article 3, which provides that "every Member of the Council of Europe must accept the principle of the rule of law..." (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34, Series A no. 18, and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 225, 20 September 2018). - EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11
Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
However, an individual may nevertheless argue that a law breaches his or her rights in the absence of a specific instance of enforcement, and thus claim to be a "victim", within the meaning of Article 34, if he or she is required either to modify his or her conduct or risk being prosecuted, or if he or she is a member of a category of persons who risk being directly affected by the legislation (see, in particular, S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, §§ 57 and 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and the references cited therein, and A.M. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 4188/21, § 72, 16 May 2023). - EGMR, 08.11.2021 - 49868/19
DOLINSKA-FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
z o.o and its conclusion under Article 6 § 1, is by itself capable of vitiating the legal force to be attached to that judgment (ibid., § 290, and Dolinska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, § 319, 8 November 2021). - EGMR, 19.12.2018 - 20452/14
MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
Unless the interpretation is arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable, the Court's role is confined to ascertaining whether the effects of that interpretation are compatible with the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 149, 19 December 2018). - EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 50490/99
BOSO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79
MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 19.05.1976 - 6959/75
BRÜGGEMANN AND SCHEUTEN v. GERMANY
- EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01
REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EuGH, 06.10.2021 - C-487/19
Nicht einvernehmliche Versetzungen von Richtern an andere Gerichte oder zwischen …
- EuGH, 19.11.2019 - C-585/18
Das vorlegende Gericht hat zu prüfen, ob die neue Disziplinarkammer des …
- EKMR, 19.05.1992 - 17004/90
H. c. NORVEGE
- EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03
TYSIAC c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 04.03.2021 - C-811/19
FQ u.a.
- EuGH, 02.03.2021 - C-824/18
Polen: Besetzung des Obersten Gerichts könnte rechtswidrig sein
- EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.06.2019 - C-585/18
Generalanwalt Tanchev kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass die neu geschaffene …
- EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 4188/21
A.M. AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 10781/10
MISICK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
- EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 59779/14
PALFREEMAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 43447/19
Streit um Justizreform: Polen verurteilt
- EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14
ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 30491/17
SOLSKA AND RYBICKA v. POLAND
- EuGH - C-448/23 (anhängig)
Kommission / Polen