Auszug aus EGMR - 41234/16

They relied on the Court's findings in the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), Guliyev v. Russia (no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008), and Idalov v. Russia ([GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012).

Having regard to the applicants" situation in the instant case and to the Court's findings in previous cases concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of the applicants" transfer by road and by rail and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (see, in particular, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), Guliyev v. Russia, no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012), as well as to a large number of pending individual cases concerning the same issues, is that situation indicative of a systemic problem and/or a structural deficiency of the Russian law warranting the application of the pilot-judgment procedure under Article 46 of the Convention (see, for general principles, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 180 et seq., 10 January 2012)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 41234/16

They relied on the Court's findings in the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), Guliyev v. Russia (no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008), and Idalov v. Russia ([GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012).

Having regard to the applicants" situation in the instant case and to the Court's findings in previous cases concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of the applicants" transfer by road and by rail and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (see, in particular, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), Guliyev v. Russia, no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012), as well as to a large number of pending individual cases concerning the same issues, is that situation indicative of a systemic problem and/or a structural deficiency of the Russian law warranting the application of the pilot-judgment procedure under Article 46 of the Convention (see, for general principles, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 180 et seq., 10 January 2012)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 41234/16

They relied on the Court's findings in the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia (no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), Guliyev v. Russia (no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008), and Idalov v. Russia ([GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012).

Having regard to the applicants" situation in the instant case and to the Court's findings in previous cases concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of the applicants" transfer by road and by rail and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (see, in particular, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), Guliyev v. Russia, no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012), as well as to a large number of pending individual cases concerning the same issues, is that situation indicative of a systemic problem and/or a structural deficiency of the Russian law warranting the application of the pilot-judgment procedure under Article 46 of the Convention (see, for general principles, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 180 et seq., 10 January 2012)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 41234/16

Having regard to the applicants" situation in the instant case and to the Court's findings in previous cases concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of the applicants" transfer by road and by rail and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (see, in particular, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 117-119, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), Guliyev v. Russia, no. 24650/02, §§ 61-69, 19 June 2008, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012), as well as to a large number of pending individual cases concerning the same issues, is that situation indicative of a systemic problem and/or a structural deficiency of the Russian law warranting the application of the pilot-judgment procedure under Article 46 of the Convention (see, for general principles, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 180 et seq., 10 January 2012)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 41234/16

In cotemporaneous proceedings, the first applicant and Mr Vasiliev, who is the applicant in case no. 56201/13, challenged the guidance on the technical specifications of the penal facilities and conveyances (Order no. 279 issued by the Ministry of Justice on 4 September 2006 and amended on 17 June 2013).