Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 41260/17 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SYDIKOVA AND ORLOV v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 302/02
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 41260/17
Having regard to the provision which makes it a criminal offence to participate in the activities of an organisation that was pronounced to be terrorist and the applicants" status as followers of Aum ShinrikyÅ, can the applicants claim to be "victims" of the alleged violation of Article 9 of the Convention? Did the Supreme Court's judgment of 20 September 2016 affect the applicants" ability to exercise their rights under Article 9 of the Convention to the extent that it constituted an interference with their right to freedom of conscience? Was that judgment based on "relevant and sufficient" reasons, did it pursue a legitimate aim, and was the ban necessary in a democratic society? Did the Supreme Court consider the impact of the ban on the rights of the followers of Aum ShinrikyÅ cult (see Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 159, 10 June 2010)?.