Rechtsprechung
EGMR - 42900/14, 44541/08, 61817/11, 11587/12, 10031/13, 42417/13, 48121/13, 31915/14, 42438/15, 45235/16 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR - 42900/14, 44541/08, 61817/11, 11587/12, 10031/13, 42417/13, 48121/13, 31915/14, 42438/15, 45235/16 (https://dejure.org/9999,97118)
EGMR - 42900/14, Entscheidung vom 44541/08, 61817/11, 11587/12, 10031/13, 42417/13, 48121/13, 31915/14, 42438/15, 45235/16 (https://dejure.org/9999,97118)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,97118) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DRUZHKOV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 630/08
MINIKAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
- did they have sufficient time to evaluate the possible risks and to take all necessary measures for carrying out the arrest (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII; Grigoryev v. Russia, no. 22663/06, § 83, 23 October 2012, Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 90, 30 May 2013, Minikayev v. Russia, no. 630/08, §§ 59-60, 5 January 2016)?. - EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09
LYAPIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
Did the authorities carry out an effective official investigation into the applicants" allegations of ill-treatment in the course of their arrest and in police custody as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV, Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 125-40, 24 July 2014)? In particular,. - EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 22663/06
GRIGORYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
- did they have sufficient time to evaluate the possible risks and to take all necessary measures for carrying out the arrest (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII; Grigoryev v. Russia, no. 22663/06, § 83, 23 October 2012, Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 90, 30 May 2013, Minikayev v. Russia, no. 630/08, §§ 59-60, 5 January 2016)?.
- EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05
DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
- did they have sufficient time to evaluate the possible risks and to take all necessary measures for carrying out the arrest (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII; Grigoryev v. Russia, no. 22663/06, § 83, 23 October 2012, Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 90, 30 May 2013, Minikayev v. Russia, no. 630/08, §§ 59-60, 5 January 2016)?. - EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95
REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
- did they have sufficient time to evaluate the possible risks and to take all necessary measures for carrying out the arrest (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII; Grigoryev v. Russia, no. 22663/06, § 83, 23 October 2012, Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 90, 30 May 2013, Minikayev v. Russia, no. 630/08, §§ 59-60, 5 January 2016)?. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
(a) have the domestic authorities discharged their burden of proof by providing a plausible or satisfactory and convincing explanation on how the applicants" injuries had been caused (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII)? In particular,. - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
Did the authorities carry out an effective official investigation into the applicants" allegations of ill-treatment in the course of their arrest and in police custody as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV, Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 125-40, 24 July 2014)? In particular,. - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR - 42900/14
(a) have the domestic authorities discharged their burden of proof by providing a plausible or satisfactory and convincing explanation on how the applicants" injuries had been caused (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII)? In particular,.