Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MANSUROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MANSUROV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  The Court reiterates that detention without a court order or other clear legal ground, regardless of the maximum length that might be established by national law, is incompatible with the standard of "lawfulness" enshrined in Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, since during the time of unauthorised detention an individual would be kept in a legal vacuum not covered by any domestic legal provision (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 149, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 57, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  TURBYLEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  The Court reiterates that the admission of confession statements obtained in violation of Article 3 of the Convention renders the criminal proceedings as a whole automatically unfair, irrespective of the probative value of those statements and irrespective of whether their use was decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, and Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015).

 
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04

  LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  The Court reiterates that detention without a court order or other clear legal ground, regardless of the maximum length that might be established by national law, is incompatible with the standard of "lawfulness" enshrined in Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, since during the time of unauthorised detention an individual would be kept in a legal vacuum not covered by any domestic legal provision (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 149, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 57, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83

  HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  The Court must nevertheless satisfy itself that the medical necessity has been convincingly shown to exist (see Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, § 83) and that the manner in which the applicant is subjected to the measure in issue should not go beyond the threshold of a minimum level of severity envisaged by the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention (see Kucheruk v. Ukraine, no. 2570/04, § 139, 6 September 2007).
• EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 2570/04

  KUCHERUK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4336/06

  The Court must nevertheless satisfy itself that the medical necessity has been convincingly shown to exist (see Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, § 83) and that the manner in which the applicant is subjected to the measure in issue should not go beyond the threshold of a minimum level of severity envisaged by the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention (see Kucheruk v. Ukraine, no. 2570/04, § 139, 6 September 2007).