Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 43987/11, 51910/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,4313) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASILJEVIC AND DROBNJAKOVIC v. SERBIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VASILJEVIC v. SERBIA and 1 other application
Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 60041/13
SINGH ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 43987/11
In such cases, the decisive point is not whether the rights claimed by the applicant are or are not transferable to the heirs wishing to pursue the procedure, but whether the heirs can in principle claim a legitimate interest in requesting the Court to deal with the case on the basis of the applicant's wish to exercise his or her individual and personal right to lodge an application with the Court (see Singh and Others v. Greece, no. 60041/13, § 26, 19 January 2017). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 43987/11
Where an applicant has died after the application in question has been lodged, the Court has accepted that the next of kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 57818/10
TIBET MENTES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 43987/11
By contrast, the Court's case-law does not deem the existence of a "genuine dispute" or an "arguable claim" to constitute a criterion for determining whether there was a "legitimate expectation" protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. Thus, no "legitimate expectation" can be said to arise where there is a dispute as to the correct interpretation and application of domestic law and the applicant's submissions are subsequently rejected by the national courts (see Kopecký, cited above, §§ 50 and 52, and Tibet Mente?? and Others v. Turkey, nos. 57818/10 and 4 others, §§ 59-61, 24 October 2017). - EGMR, 04.05.2016 - 18768/05
SAGHINADZE AND OTHERS AGAINST GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 43987/11
An "expectation" is "legitimate" if there is sufficient basis for that interest in national law - for example if it is based on either a legislative provision or a legal act bearing on the property interest in question (see Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 18768/05, § 103, 27 May 2010) or where there is settled case-law of the domestic courts confirming it (see Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 52, ECHR 2004-IX, and Brezovec v. Croatia, no. 13488/07, § 39, 29 March 2011).