Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,3111
EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07 (https://dejure.org/2020,3111)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.02.2020 - 44837/07 (https://dejure.org/2020,3111)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Februar 2020 - 44837/07 (https://dejure.org/2020,3111)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,3111) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97

    OKYAY AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    Relevant domestic law 11. A description of the relevant law with respect to the right to living in a healthy environment and the duty of the domestic authorities to enforce court judgments can be found in Okyay and Others v. Turkey (no. 36220/97, §§ 46, 50 and 57-59, ECHR 2005-VII).
  • EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 46117/99

    Taskin u.a. ./. Türkei - Umgehung einer rechtskräftigen Entscheidung der Justiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    In a case concerning a mine where gold was extracted by sodium cyanide leaching, and which was located at distances ranging from 300 to 900 metres from the homes of most of the applicants, the Court held Article 8 to be applicable, having regard to the findings of the domestic courts, which had been based on an environmental impact assessment, that the operation of the mine had caused widespread environmental degradation and had affected the applicants (see Ta??kin and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117/99, § 112, ECHR 2004-X).
  • EGMR, 22.05.2003 - 41666/98

    KYRTATOS c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    There is no explicit right in the Convention to a clean and quiet environment, but where an individual is directly and seriously affected by noise or other pollution, an issue may arise under Article 8 (see Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 96, ECHR 2003-VIII; Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, § 52, ECHR 2003-VI; and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 68, ECHR 2005-IV).
  • EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

    LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    Furthermore, the adverse effects of the environmental pollution must attain a certain minimum level if they are to fall within the scope of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C).
  • EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

    AZINAS c. CHYPRE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    If the complaint presented before the Court has not been put, either explicitly or in substance, to the national courts when it could have been raised in the exercise of a remedy available to the applicant, the national legal order has been denied the opportunity to address the Convention issue which the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is intended to give it (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

    FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
    There is no explicit right in the Convention to a clean and quiet environment, but where an individual is directly and seriously affected by noise or other pollution, an issue may arise under Article 8 (see Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 96, ECHR 2003-VIII; Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, § 52, ECHR 2003-VI; and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 68, ECHR 2005-IV).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 6142/18

    KOTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court reiterates that in order to fall within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention, complaints relating to environmental nuisances have to show, firstly, that there was an actual interference with the applicant's private sphere, and, secondly, that a level of severity was attained; in other words, whether the alleged pollution was serious enough to affect adversely, to a sufficient extent, the family and private lives of the applicants and their enjoyment of their homes (see Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 70, ECHR 2005-IV (with further references), and Çiçek and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 44837/07, §§ 29-30, 4 February 2020).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht