Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 4505/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,15649) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SOKIRYANSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (englisch)
Sonstiges
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 4505/08
- EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 4505/08
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01
OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 4505/08
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). - EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06
HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 4505/08
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). - EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 28326/09
P.F. AND E.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 4505/08
Likewise, where the alleged violation concerns Article 3 of the Convention the Court has held that the State is under an obligation to take "reasonable steps" to prevent ill-treatment of which the authorities had or ought to have had knowledge (see Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V, and P.F. and E.F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28326/09, § 37, 23 November 2010).