Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 4876/15, 30367/15, 37483/15, 55308/15 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,80925) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04
BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 4876/15
If so, was that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article 11 § 2 of the Convention, in respect of each applicant? In particular, given the spontaneous character of the assembly and that it was impossible to give notice within the time-limit prescribed by law, was the interference proportionate in the circumstances of the present case (see Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-III, and Eva Molnar v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 36-38, 7 January 2009)?. - EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05
EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 4876/15
If so, was that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article 11 § 2 of the Convention, in respect of each applicant? In particular, given the spontaneous character of the assembly and that it was impossible to give notice within the time-limit prescribed by law, was the interference proportionate in the circumstances of the present case (see Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-III, and Eva Molnar v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 36-38, 7 January 2009)?.