Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 18297/03

  LADNER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 48777/07

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 11084/02

  H.G. AND G.B. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 48777/07

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 39392/98

  L. AND V. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 48777/07

  Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).

• EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 31913/07

  E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

  (Applications nos. 31913/07, 38357/07, 48098/07, 48777/07 and 48779/07).

  The case originated in five applications (nos. 31913/07, 38357/07, 48098/07, 48777/07 and 48779/07) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by four Austrian nationals, Mr E.B. ("the first applicant"), Mr H.G. ("the second applicant"), Mr A.S. ("the third applicant") and Mr A.V. ("the fourth applicant"), on 26 October 2006, 17 August 2007 and 18 October 2007.

• EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 2362/08

  F. J. AND E.B. v. AUSTRIA

  A more detailed description of the law, the Constitutional Court's judgments concerning Article 209 of the Criminal Code and its replacement by Article 207b of the Criminal Code can be found in E.B. and Others v. Austria, (nos. 31913/07, 38357/07/48098/07, 48777/07 and 48779/07, §§ 48-52, 7 November 2013).

  The Court observes in the first place that the applicant relied on Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention as he had done in the case of E.B. and Others v. Austria (nos. 31913/07, 38357/07, 48098/07, 48777/07 and 48779/07, 7 November 2013).