Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MURDALOVY v. RUSSIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MURDALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 2 othe applications

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 44093/98

  ÇELIK AND IMRET v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  A complaint may be regarded as arguable when it is not prima facie untenable and warrants an examination on the merits by the appropriate national authorities (see Çelik and Imret v. Turkey, no. 44093/98, § 57, 26 October 2004; Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no. 37038/97, § 117, 29 November 2005; and Singh and Others v. Belgium, no. 33210/11, § 84, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  We of course agree that under Article 13 an effective remedy is required only for Convention complaints that can be regarded as "arguable" under the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 208, ECHR 2012; and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 207, 23 February 2016).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  We of course agree that under Article 13 an effective remedy is required only for Convention complaints that can be regarded as "arguable" under the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 208, ECHR 2012; and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 207, 23 February 2016).

 
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 41872/10

  M.A. c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  The arguability of a Convention complaint forming the basis of a complaint under Article 13 must be determined in the light of the particular facts and the nature of the legal issue or issues raised (see, among other authorities, Boyle and Rice, cited above, § 55; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 27, Series A no. 139; Diallo v. the Czech Republic, no. 20493/07, § 64, 23 June 2011; M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 117, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and Asalya v. Turkey, no. 43875/09, § 97, 15 April 2014).
• EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 37038/97

  NURI KURT v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  A complaint may be regarded as arguable when it is not prima facie untenable and warrants an examination on the merits by the appropriate national authorities (see Çelik and Imret v. Turkey, no. 44093/98, § 57, 26 October 2004; Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no. 37038/97, § 117, 29 November 2005; and Singh and Others v. Belgium, no. 33210/11, § 84, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  The arguability of a Convention complaint forming the basis of a complaint under Article 13 must be determined in the light of the particular facts and the nature of the legal issue or issues raised (see, among other authorities, Boyle and Rice, cited above, § 55; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 27, Series A no. 139; Diallo v. the Czech Republic, no. 20493/07, § 64, 23 June 2011; M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 117, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and Asalya v. Turkey, no. 43875/09, § 97, 15 April 2014).
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 43875/09

  ASALYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  The arguability of a Convention complaint forming the basis of a complaint under Article 13 must be determined in the light of the particular facts and the nature of the legal issue or issues raised (see, among other authorities, Boyle and Rice, cited above, § 55; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 27, Series A no. 139; Diallo v. the Czech Republic, no. 20493/07, § 64, 23 June 2011; M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 117, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and Asalya v. Turkey, no. 43875/09, § 97, 15 April 2014).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  This is essential for maintaining the public's confidence in, and support for, the rule of law and for preventing any appearance of the authorities tolerating or colluding in unlawful acts (see Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 51933/08

  Merits 60. The Court has found on many occasions that in a situation of enforced disappearance, the close relatives of the victim may themselves be victims of treatment in violation of Article 3. The essence of such a violation does not mainly lie in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 48523/19

  N.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In respect of pecuniary damages claimed, the Court recalls that loss of earnings applies to close relatives of the disappeared persons, including spouses, elderly parents and children (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); as well as Ortsuyeva and Others v. Russia, no 3340/08, § 119, 22 November 2016; and Murdalovy v. Russia, no. 51933/08, § 108, 31 March 2020.
• EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 52641/16

  K.P. v. POLAND

  Regard being had to the above, the Court considers that the State has discharged the procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to conduct an effective investigation (see Murdalovy v. Russia, no. 51933/08, § 91, 31 March 2020).