Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 54261/13, 18361/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,3696) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA and 1 other application
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 36549/03
Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Beweisverwertungsverbot; Verwertungsverbot …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 54261/13
The fact that the applicant confessed to the PDI investigator and not the police officers who had ill-treated him is, in the Court's opinion, not decisive (compare Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, § 65, ECHR 2007-III). - EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 23086/08
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 54261/13
It is notable that no report was filed at the material time by the arresting police officers about any injuries sustained by the applicant during his arrest as required under section 29 of the Police Act (see Mushegh Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no. 23086/08, § 122, 20 September 2018), whereas the applicant consistently denied that version of events throughout the investigation.