Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 5568/19, 17386/19, 37182/19, 39278/19, 15205/20 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR - 5568/19, Entscheidung vom 17386/19, 37182/19, 39278/19, 15205/20 (https://dejure.org/9999,133489)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,133489) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SIMONOV AND NEBIYERIDZE v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04
S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR - 5568/19
Has there been a violation of Mr Simonov's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convection, as a result of the taking of his fingerprints? Were his fingerprints stored? Was the interference prescribed by law? In particular, does the legal framework governing the taking and retention of fingerprints meet the "quality of law" requirements by providing for adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse (see S and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 99 and 103, ECHR 2008)? Did the interference pursue a legitimate aim? Was it "necessary in a democratic society" (compare S. and Marper, cited above; and Gaughran v. the United Kingdom, no. 45245/15, 13 February 2020)?. - EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 16428/05
GARDEL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR - 5568/19
(ii) Was any such interference in accordance with the law? Did the legal provisions governing the creation and maintenance of the "Rubin" database meet the "quality of law" requirements by providing for adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse (see Gardel v. France, no. 16428/05, § 62, ECHR 2009; and Catt v. the United Kingdom, no. 43514/15, §§ 94-107, 24 January 2019)? Were these legal acts officially published?. - EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 45245/15
GAUGHRAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR - 5568/19
Has there been a violation of Mr Simonov's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convection, as a result of the taking of his fingerprints? Were his fingerprints stored? Was the interference prescribed by law? In particular, does the legal framework governing the taking and retention of fingerprints meet the "quality of law" requirements by providing for adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse (see S and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 99 and 103, ECHR 2008)? Did the interference pursue a legitimate aim? Was it "necessary in a democratic society" (compare S. and Marper, cited above; and Gaughran v. the United Kingdom, no. 45245/15, 13 February 2020)?. - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
Auszug aus EGMR - 5568/19
Has there been a violation of Mr Simonov's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convection, as a result of the taking of his fingerprints? Were his fingerprints stored? Was the interference prescribed by law? In particular, does the legal framework governing the taking and retention of fingerprints meet the "quality of law" requirements by providing for adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse (see S and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 99 and 103, ECHR 2008)? Did the interference pursue a legitimate aim? Was it "necessary in a democratic society" (compare S. and Marper, cited above; and Gaughran v. the United Kingdom, no. 45245/15, 13 February 2020)?. - EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 43514/15
CATT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR - 5568/19
(ii) Was any such interference in accordance with the law? Did the legal provisions governing the creation and maintenance of the "Rubin" database meet the "quality of law" requirements by providing for adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse (see Gardel v. France, no. 16428/05, § 62, ECHR 2009; and Catt v. the United Kingdom, no. 43514/15, §§ 94-107, 24 January 2019)? Were these legal acts officially published?.