Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HUBERT NOWAK v. POLAND

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NOWAK v. POLAND

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  In the context of alleged medical negligence, the States' substantive positive obligations relating to medical treatment are limited to a duty to regulate, that is to say, a duty to put in place an effective regulatory framework compelling hospitals, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients' lives (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I, with further references, and Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal [GC], no. 78103/14, § 105, 31 January 2019).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular, the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - are set out in the Court's decisions in Charzy?„ski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V) and Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10 and 2 others, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015).
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  Article 2 also comes into play in situations where the person concerned was the victim of an activity or conduct, whether public or private, which by its nature put his or her life at real and imminent risk and he or she has suffered injuries that appear life-threatening as they occur, even though he or she ultimately survived (see, among others, Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 140, 25 June 2019; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI; and Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329/02, § 108, 22 February 2011).

 
• EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10

  RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular, the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - are set out in the Court's decisions in Charzy?„ski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V) and Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10 and 2 others, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015).
• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 24329/02

  SOARE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  Article 2 also comes into play in situations where the person concerned was the victim of an activity or conduct, whether public or private, which by its nature put his or her life at real and imminent risk and he or she has suffered injuries that appear life-threatening as they occur, even though he or she ultimately survived (see, among others, Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 140, 25 June 2019; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI; and Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329/02, § 108, 22 February 2011).
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  Article 2 also comes into play in situations where the person concerned was the victim of an activity or conduct, whether public or private, which by its nature put his or her life at real and imminent risk and he or she has suffered injuries that appear life-threatening as they occur, even though he or she ultimately survived (see, among others, Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 140, 25 June 2019; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI; and Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329/02, § 108, 22 February 2011).
• EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 13423/09

  MEHMET SENTÜRK ET BEKIR SENTÜRK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 57916/16

  In these circumstances, even assuming that the applicant could be considered as having received deficient, incorrect, or delayed treatment, it cannot be concluded that the emergency services knowingly put his life in danger by denying him access to life-saving emergency treatment (compare and contrast Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey, no. 13423/09, § 104, ECHR 2013).

• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 8530/08

  VOLINTIRU c. ITALIE

  Elle a aussi admis que des mesures disciplinaires peuvent également être envisagées (ibidem, §§ 137 et 215 ; voir aussi Hubert Nowak c. Pologne, no 57916/16, § 89, 16 février 2023).
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 73865/16

  M.Ð. AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  The Court considers that the applicants' complaints, made under various Articles, fall to be examined solely under Article 2 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018, and, mutatis mutandis, Hubert Nowak v. Poland, no. 57916/16, §§ 59-60, 16 February 2023).