Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10, 43918/11, 10093/12, 53623/15, 13251/16, 33790/16, 31415/17, 41104/17, 34980/18, 47308/18   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,17880
EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10, 43918/11, 10093/12, 53623/15, 13251/16, 33790/16, 31415/17, 41104/17, 34980/18, 47308/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,17880)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19.07.2022 - 62082/10, 43918/11, 10093/12, 53623/15, 13251/16, 33790/16, 31415/17, 41104/17, 34980/18, 47308/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,17880)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19. Juli 2022 - 62082/10, 43918/11, 10093/12, 53623/15, 13251/16, 33790/16, 31415/17, 41104/17, 34980/18, 47308/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,17880)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,17880) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 2257/12

    ZADUMOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018, the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present cases (see also Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 66215/12

    KUMITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018, the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present cases (see also Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    It thus considers that this complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on its merits (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
  • EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 5753/09

    NOSKO AND NEFEDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    The present case is identical to other Russian cases on entrapment, in which the Court found in the past violations on account of deficiencies in procedure for authorising undercover operations in the context of investigating offences concerning bribes or illegal distribution of drugs (see Nosko and Nefedov v. Russia, nos. 5753/09 and 11789/10, 30 October 2014; Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, 24 April 2014; and Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 76695/11

    UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    In the absence of such documents, the Court finds no basis on which to accept that the costs and expenses claimed have actually been incurred by those applicants and rejects their claim for costs and expenses (see, among others, Udaltsov v. Russia, no. 76695/11, § 201, 6 October 2020, and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, §§ 89-90, 17 July 2018).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 29431/05

    ZUBKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    Having examined all the material before it and having regard to its case law on the matter, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see Zubkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 29431/05 and 2 others, §§ 120-33, 7 November 2017).
  • EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 66152/14

    KUZMINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    The Court has recently reiterated that that the Russian legal system does not provide for adequate and effective legal safeguards for authorising and supervising undercover operations, a structural problem which exposed applicants to arbitrary action by the police and prevented the domestic courts from conducting an effective judicial review of their entrapment pleas (see Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, with further references).
  • EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 40442/07

    MANELYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    The domestic courts, in particular, either failed to verify the sources of incriminating information or review the reasons for carrying out undercover operations and the circumstances surrounding it; neither did they duly assess the conduct of the police officers and their informers vis-à-vis the applicants for any signs of psychological pressure or possible links between the informers and the police (see Kuzmina and Others, cited above, § 104; and contrast Manelyuk and Others v. Russia [Committee] nos. 40442/07 and 3 others, §§ 34, 38-39 and 40-42, 8 October 2019).
  • EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09

    LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    The present case is identical to other Russian cases on entrapment, in which the Court found in the past violations on account of deficiencies in procedure for authorising undercover operations in the context of investigating offences concerning bribes or illegal distribution of drugs (see Nosko and Nefedov v. Russia, nos. 5753/09 and 11789/10, 30 October 2014; Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, 24 April 2014; and Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 23200/10

    VESELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 62082/10
    The present case is identical to other Russian cases on entrapment, in which the Court found in the past violations on account of deficiencies in procedure for authorising undercover operations in the context of investigating offences concerning bribes or illegal distribution of drugs (see Nosko and Nefedov v. Russia, nos. 5753/09 and 11789/10, 30 October 2014; Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, 24 April 2014; and Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07

    Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt

  • EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 40018/16

    UGURYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Ivanov and Others v. Russia, nos.62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022.

    62082/10 and 6 others, 19 July 2022.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht