Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 62663/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20810) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCENSNOVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SCENSNOVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 62663/13
The Court has repeatedly held that a short length of time for outdoor exercise - for instance when such exercise is limited to about one hour per day - may be a factor that exacerbates the situation of a prisoner confined to his or her cell for the rest of the time (ibid., § 143; see also Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 151, 10 January 2012, and Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 235, 27 January 2015; also contrast Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10
Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 62663/13
The Court has repeatedly held that a short length of time for outdoor exercise - for instance when such exercise is limited to about one hour per day - may be a factor that exacerbates the situation of a prisoner confined to his or her cell for the rest of the time (ibid., § 143; see also Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 151, 10 January 2012, and Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 235, 27 January 2015; also contrast Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2016).
- EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19
ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
Relying on the cases of Mironovas and Others (cited above, § 85), and ? censnovicius v. Lithuania (no. 62663/13, §§ 71-73, 10 July 2018), as well as the principle of subsidiarity, the Government further argued that once the impugned situation had come to an end because a person had been released or placed in conditions that met the requirements of Article 3, he or she should use a compensatory remedy. - EGMR, 20.06.2019 - 497/17
CHIARELLO v. GERMANY
November 2008, mit weiteren Nachweisen; Scensnovicius./. Litauen, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 62663/13, Rdnr. 92, 10.