Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09, 53373/14, 77068/14, 43701/18, 19125/20, 23922/20, 26735/20, 53881/20, 53488/21, 61520/21, 3034/22 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MASLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MASLOVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (57)
- EGMR - 43701/18 (anhängig)
LYAPIN v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
LOCUS STANDI 9. Following the death of the applicant Mr Lyapin (application no. 43701/18) his wife Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina expressed her wish to pursue the applications on behalf of the deceased applicant.62807/09 and 43701/18, in respect of whom it finds only a violation of the procedural limb of that provision.
62807/09, 43701/18, 19125/20, 26735/20 and 3034/22 also submitted complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.
Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares that Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina has standing to pursue application no. 43701/18 in the stead of the late applicant Mr Lyapin; Rejects the Government's request to strike application no. 53373/14 out of its list of cases under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention on the basis of the unilateral declaration which they submitted; Declares the complaints concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, and the failure to investigate the allegations of the ill-treatment, and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need for a separate examination of the applicants' remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and dismisses the remainder of application no. 77068/14 as inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of both the substantive and procedural limbs of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, with the exception of the applicants in applications nos.
62807/09 and 43701/18, in respect of whom it finds only a violation of the procedural limb of that provision; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;.
43701/18.
- EGMR - 77068/14 (anhängig)
KARPYUK v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
The Ukrainian Government were invited to intervene as third party in the proceedings in application no. 77068/14.On 16 December 2014 the Court applied interim measure in application no. 77068/14 and gave it priority (under Rules 39 and 41 of the Rules of Court).
53373/14, 77068/14, 23922/20 and 53881/20 the applicants submitted other complaints which, in the light of the Court's established case-law, also raised issues under the Convention, including a complaint under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the use for conviction of self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture or ill-treatment (see attached table).
REMAINING COMPLAINTS 22. The applicant in application no. 77068/14 also raised other complaints under various Convention provisions.
Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares that Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina has standing to pursue application no. 43701/18 in the stead of the late applicant Mr Lyapin; Rejects the Government's request to strike application no. 53373/14 out of its list of cases under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention on the basis of the unilateral declaration which they submitted; Declares the complaints concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, and the failure to investigate the allegations of the ill-treatment, and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need for a separate examination of the applicants' remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and dismisses the remainder of application no. 77068/14 as inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of both the substantive and procedural limbs of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, with the exception of the applicants in applications nos.
77068/14.
- EGMR - 53373/14 (anhängig)
ZHDAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
THE GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST TO STRIKE OUT THE APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 37 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 12. The Government submitted unilateral declaration in application no. 53373/14 whereby they acknowledged violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention in respect of the applicant and offered to pay him a sum of money.53373/14, 77068/14, 23922/20 and 53881/20 the applicants submitted other complaints which, in the light of the Court's established case-law, also raised issues under the Convention, including a complaint under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the use for conviction of self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture or ill-treatment (see attached table).
Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares that Ms Liliya Viktorovna Lyapina has standing to pursue application no. 43701/18 in the stead of the late applicant Mr Lyapin; Rejects the Government's request to strike application no. 53373/14 out of its list of cases under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention on the basis of the unilateral declaration which they submitted; Declares the complaints concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, and the failure to investigate the allegations of the ill-treatment, and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need for a separate examination of the applicants' remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and dismisses the remainder of application no. 77068/14 as inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of both the substantive and procedural limbs of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, with the exception of the applicants in applications nos.
53373/14.
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09
LYAPIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
Furthermore, in the cases of Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 128-40, 24 July 2014, and Samesov v. Russia, no. 57269/14, §§ 54-63, 20 November 2018, as well as in Kuchta and Metel v. Poland, no. 76813/16, § 88, 2 September 2021, the Court has already found, in particular, that the authorities' refusal to open a fully-fledged criminal investigation into the credible allegations of ill-treatment, as well as the lack of assessment of the necessity and proportionality of the use of lawful force by the police were indicative of the State's failure to fulfil its procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention.The present case is a follow-up complaint lodged by the applicant following the first judgment delivered by the Court in his case of Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, 24 July 2014.
Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 30-41, 24 July 2014.
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 06.11.2012 - 13/11
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
Forensic expert report no. 828/2018 of 13/11/2018 by the Tuapse Forensic Bureau: hematoma around both eyes, brain concussion.On 13/11/2018 the applicant's sister and then on 16/04/2019 the applicant complained to the Tuapse district investigative committee/On 10/04/2019 refusal to open a criminal case/ On 16/04/2019 decision to open a criminal case/ Between 16/10/2019 and 01/07/2021 seven decisions to close the investigation for the lack of corpus delicti; each decision was overruled by the investigators' superiors.
- RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05
Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
Expert report no. 13 of 28/05/2021 by the 111th Main Centre of Forensics of the Ministry of Defence on the examination carried out on 20/05/2021: abrasion on the right shoulder measuring 0.5x0.4 cm, bruises on the right knee measuring 2x1.7 cm and on the left shin measuring 2x1 cm; the injuries could have originated between 5 to 9 days prior to the examination in the circumstances described by the applicant.On 20/05/2021 complaint to the 314th military investigations department/on 31/05/2021 and 05/07/2021 refusals to open a criminal case as no crime had taken place: the applicant was interviewed and maintained his complaints; the implicated officers were also questioned and they either denied using any physical force (officer I.) or stated that the force had been used due to the applicant's resistance (officers B., S., F. and G.).
- KAGH, 05.07.2013 - K 24/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
On 17/09/2019 the Basmanniy District Court of Moscow refused to examine the applicant's complaint for the lack of subject matter/ Upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 24/12/2019.24/12/2021.
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 839/02
MASLOVA AND NALBANDOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
The present case is a follow up complaint lodged by the applicant following the first judgment delivered by the Court in Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, 24 January 2008.See Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia no. 839/02, 24 January 2008, §§ 39-48.
- RG, 30.05.1908 - I 30/06
Eigener Nach-Sicht-Wechsel; Protest
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision of the Moscow City Court, 30/06/2020; community service, of 30 hours,.article 20.2 § 5 of CAO; community service of 30 hours; final decision by the Moscow City Court, on 30/06/2020.
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09
TURBYLEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 62807/09
45044/06 and 5 others, §§ 111-12, 12 December 2017, Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015, Belugin v. Russia, no. 2991/06, § 70, 26 November 2019, Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos.6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - in view of the use of the applicant's self-incriminating statements obtained as a result of torture for his conviction (see Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 92-97, 6 October 2015).
- KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09
Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 72051/17
KORNEYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 52783/08
LEONID PETROV v. RUSSIA
- VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01
- EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 50271/06
RYABININA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11
Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.06.2012 - 10/12
- SG Berlin, 14.09.1955 - 15/12
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04
- VK Rheinland-Pfalz, 27.05.2005 - 15/05
Nachprüfungsverfahren: Antragsbefugnis trotz fehlender Angebotsabgabe
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 39708/07
ALEKSANDR KONOVALOV v. RUSSIA
- KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06
- EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 60844/11
DAURBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
- RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03
Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
- EGMR, 07.05.2020 - 21171/16
GHEORGHE COBZARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13
YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
- VK Niedersachsen, 08.11.2002 - 203-VgK-24/02
Ausschreibung der Lieferung eines Hafenmobilkrans und eines Reach-Stackers im …
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02
LIGERES v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06
KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- FG Hamburg, 11.04.2001 - V 21/01
Rückforderung von Steuererstattungen bei angezeigter Abtretung; …
- EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 26679/08
NEVZLIN v. RUSSIA
- VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04
- KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
- VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02
Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14
ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 5666/07
ZAGAYNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.02.2005 - 12/04
- EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 2991/06
BELUGIN v. RUSSIA
- VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11
Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08
TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.07.2007 - 15/04
- EuGH, 09.02.2006 - C-23/04
Sfakianakis - Assoziierungsabkommen EWG-Ungarn - Verpflichtung der Zollbehörden, …
- EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 19421/15
V.D. v. CROATIA (No. 2)
- VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10
Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
- EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 2281/06
ALEKSANDR ANDREYEV v. RUSSIA
- KAG Mainz, 21.08.2012 - M 12/12
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
- LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08
Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …
- EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15
KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 7077/06
FORTALNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01
SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 57269/14
SAMESOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09
Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte
- EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 76813/16
KUCHTA AND METEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 62003/08
KURSISH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA