Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IBRAHIMOV AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  IBRAHIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 6 other applications

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 18 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

  Oberschlick ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16

  Moreover, Article 10 of the Convention protects not only the substance of the ideas and information expressed but also the form in which they are conveyed (see Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, § 57, Series A no. 204).

• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 14065/15

  LACATUS c. SUISSE

  Il convient de rappeler que la Cour a précisé à maintes reprises que la liberté d'expression s'étend également à certaines formes de comportement (voir, notamment, Ibrahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, §§ 166-167, 13 février 2020, Murat Vural c. Turquie, no 9540/07, 21 octobre 2014, et Semir Güzel c. Turquie, no 29483/09, 13 septembre 2016).
• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21

  ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA

  It should be noted at the outset that the requirement to exhaust domestic remedies laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention applies also to complaints under Article 18 of the Convention (see Rustamzade v. Azerbaijan, no. 38239/16, § 58, 7 March 2019; Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 144, 13 February 2020; and Savalanli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 54151/11 and 3 others, § 107, 15 November 2022).
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  The Court notes that, as can be seen from the case-file material, the applicant had no criminal history of being involved in drug related crimes (compare Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 119, 13 February 2020).

 
• EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 44153/15

  SKORUPA v. POLAND

  The foregoing considerations are sufficient to enable the Court to conclude that the authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into the applicant's credible allegations of ill-treatment (see, mutatis mutandis, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 104-05, 13 February 2020, and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 51, 24 November 2016).
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 4161/13

  KARUYEV v. RUSSIA

  63571/16 and 5 others, 13 February 2020, concerning the pouring of paint on statues of historical figures; Shvydka v. Ukraine, no. 17888/12, 30 October 2014, concerning the detaching of a ribbon from a wreath laid by the head of State; Sinkova v. Ukraine, no. 39496/11, 27 February 2018, concerning the frying of eggs and sausages over the "eternal flame" at a war memorial; Stern Taulats and Roura Capellera v. Spain, nos.
• EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 27753/19

  EL-ASMAR v. DENMARK

  That is justified by the fact that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and the authorities are under a duty to protect them (see, among other authorities, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, § 89, 13 February 2020).
• EGMR - 53205/17 (anhängig)

  ORUJOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the applicant's pre-trial detention compatible with Article 5 § 1 (c) in terms of being justified and based on a reasonable suspicion (see, among many other authorities, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-30, 13 February 2020, and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981/14, § 114-34, 17 March 2016)?.
• EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 28154/20

  ETE c. TÜRKIYE

  La Cour rappelle avoir déjà jugé que les opinions peuvent être exprimées, non seulement sous formes verbales ou écrites, mais également par le biais d'un comportement et que les actes constituant un mélange de comportement et d'expression verbale s'analysait en une forme d'expression artistique et politique couverte par l'article 10 de la Convention (voir, Ibrahimov et Mammadov c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 63571/16 et 5 autres, § 165-167, 13 février 2020 et les exemples y cités).
• VG Würzburg, 28.10.2021 - W 7 K 21.30163

  Herkunftsland Aserbaidschan, Folgeantrag, herausgehobene exilpolitische …

  Aus den Erkenntnismitteln geht weiter hervor, dass in Aserbaidschan Folter und Misshandlungen von Inhaftierten zwar verboten sind und derart erpresste Geständnisse gerichtlich nicht verwertbar sind, ebenso aber, dass bekanntermaßen weiter derartige Misshandlungen stattfinden, ohne dass die Verantwortlichen mit konsequenter Strafverfolgung und disziplinarischen Maßnahmen zu rechnen hätten (…vgl. BFA, Länderinformationsblatt a.a.O., S. 13 f., 25; vgl. auch Amnesty International, Auskunft an das VG Gelsenkirchen v. 9.5.2018 und Jahresbericht Aserbaidschan 2020; EGMR, U.v. 25.8.2020 - Nr. 63571/16, Ibrahimov und Mammadov gegen Aserbaidschan).