Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43293) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ARPALI v. TURKEY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 31322/07
HAAS c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
According to the Court's case-law, Article 2 may imply, in certain circumstances, a positive obligation on the authorities to take preventive operational measures to protect an individual even from himself (see Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, § 81, ECHR 2008 (extracts), and Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322/07, § 54, ECHR 2011). - EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96
CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
The Court also recalls that, if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case (see, for example, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VII). - EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
However, although the Convention does not guarantee as such a right to have criminal proceedings instituted against third parties, even in cases of non-intentional interferences with the right to life or physical integrity, there may be exceptional circumstances where an effective criminal investigation is necessary to satisfy the procedural obligation imposed by Article 2 (see, Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 160, 25 June 2019). - EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
The Court considers that the applicants" complaints should be examined solely from the standpoint of Article 2, bearing in mind that, since it is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, it is not bound by the characterisation given by an applicant or a government (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, ECHR 2018). - EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 66859/12
The Court also recalls that, if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case (see, for example, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VII).