Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,6619
EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,6619)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.03.2022 - 68144/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,6619)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. März 2022 - 68144/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,6619)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,6619) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

    ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    The general principles concerning the applicability of Article 6 § 2 in proceedings that follow the conclusion of criminal proceedings are set out in the Court's judgment Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC] (no. 25424/09, §§ 92-105, ECHR 2013).
  • EGMR, 08.03.2007 - 18712/03

    THIERMANN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    Where an applicant has failed to comply with formal requirements, the application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    Where an applicant has failed to comply with formal requirements, the application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007).
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    The Court reiterates that the purpose of the rule on the exhaustion of domestic remedies is to afford Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right violations that they are alleged to have committed before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2020 - 44101/13

    ILIAS PAPAGEORGIOU v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    The full plenary of the Court of Cassation issued on 15 July 2020 judgment no. 4/2020, which ruled on the issue of whether the civil courts are bound by the decisions of the criminal courts (see Ilias Papageorgiou v. Greece, no. 44101/13, §§ 20-25, 10 December 2020).
  • EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 3453/12

    KAPETANIOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    Lastly, the Court notes that the situation in the present case differs from Kapetanios and Others v. Greece (nos. 3453/12 and 2 others, § 66, 30 April 2015), in which the Court held that the domestic court should have examined of its own motion the consequences of the final criminal acquittal judgment for the relevant pending proceedings.
  • EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 527/05

    DOGGAKIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
    Τhe rules governing those formal steps to be taken are aimed at ensuring the proper administration of justice and compliance, in particular, with the principle of legal certainty and the equality of arms (see Doggakis and Others v. Greece, no. 527/05, § 20, 26 July 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht