Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,6619) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DIAMANTOPOULOS v. GREECE
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DIAMANTOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
The general principles concerning the applicability of Article 6 § 2 in proceedings that follow the conclusion of criminal proceedings are set out in the Court's judgment Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC] (no. 25424/09, §§ 92-105, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 08.03.2007 - 18712/03
THIERMANN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
Where an applicant has failed to comply with formal requirements, the application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
Where an applicant has failed to comply with formal requirements, the application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007).
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
The Court reiterates that the purpose of the rule on the exhaustion of domestic remedies is to afford Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right violations that they are alleged to have committed before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 10.12.2020 - 44101/13
ILIAS PAPAGEORGIOU v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
The full plenary of the Court of Cassation issued on 15 July 2020 judgment no. 4/2020, which ruled on the issue of whether the civil courts are bound by the decisions of the criminal courts (see Ilias Papageorgiou v. Greece, no. 44101/13, §§ 20-25, 10 December 2020). - EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 3453/12
KAPETANIOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
Lastly, the Court notes that the situation in the present case differs from Kapetanios and Others v. Greece (nos. 3453/12 and 2 others, § 66, 30 April 2015), in which the Court held that the domestic court should have examined of its own motion the consequences of the final criminal acquittal judgment for the relevant pending proceedings. - EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 527/05
DOGGAKIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 68144/13
Τhe rules governing those formal steps to be taken are aimed at ensuring the proper administration of justice and compliance, in particular, with the principle of legal certainty and the equality of arms (see Doggakis and Others v. Greece, no. 527/05, § 20, 26 July 2007).