Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 68163/14 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
AGEYEVY v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08
BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
Does the present application fall within the Court's competence ratione materiae, in the light of the principles established in the Court's case law (see, among other authorities, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, ECHR 2009-...; Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470/99, ECHR 2003-IV; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, 10 April 2008; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29156/09, 26 July 2011; Bochan c. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, CEDH 2015, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, 17 February 2015)?. - EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11
KUDESHKINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
Does the present application fall within the Court's competence ratione materiae, in the light of the principles established in the Court's case law (see, among other authorities, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, ECHR 2009-...; Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470/99, ECHR 2003-IV; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, 10 April 2008; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29156/09, 26 July 2011; Bochan c. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, CEDH 2015, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, 17 February 2015)?. - EGMR, 04.10.2012 - 43631/09
HARROUDJ c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
In view of the domestic authorities" obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to act in a manner calculated to enable a family tie with a child - where the existence of such a tie has been established - to be developed and to take measures with a view to reuniting that child with his or her family (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 150, ECHR 2004-V (extracts); Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 64, 13 December 2007, and Harroudj v. France, no. 43631/09, § 41, 4 October 2012), have the domestic authorities at any moment taken any steps to discharge that obligation in the present case? If not, has there been a breach of the State's positive obligation to respect for the applicants" family and/or private life, as required by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?.
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02
Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
Does the present application fall within the Court's competence ratione materiae, in the light of the principles established in the Court's case law (see, among other authorities, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, ECHR 2009-...; Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470/99, ECHR 2003-IV; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, 10 April 2008; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29156/09, 26 July 2011; Bochan c. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, CEDH 2015, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, 17 February 2015)?. - EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 39051/03
EMONET ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
In view of the domestic authorities" obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to act in a manner calculated to enable a family tie with a child - where the existence of such a tie has been established - to be developed and to take measures with a view to reuniting that child with his or her family (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 150, ECHR 2004-V (extracts); Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 64, 13 December 2007, and Harroudj v. France, no. 43631/09, § 41, 4 October 2012), have the domestic authorities at any moment taken any steps to discharge that obligation in the present case? If not, has there been a breach of the State's positive obligation to respect for the applicants" family and/or private life, as required by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?. - EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78030/01
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
In view of the domestic authorities" obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to act in a manner calculated to enable a family tie with a child - where the existence of such a tie has been established - to be developed and to take measures with a view to reuniting that child with his or her family (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 150, ECHR 2004-V (extracts); Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 64, 13 December 2007, and Harroudj v. France, no. 43631/09, § 41, 4 October 2012), have the domestic authorities at any moment taken any steps to discharge that obligation in the present case? If not, has there been a breach of the State's positive obligation to respect for the applicants" family and/or private life, as required by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?. - EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 78028/01
PINI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
In view of the domestic authorities" obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to act in a manner calculated to enable a family tie with a child - where the existence of such a tie has been established - to be developed and to take measures with a view to reuniting that child with his or her family (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 150, ECHR 2004-V (extracts); Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 64, 13 December 2007, and Harroudj v. France, no. 43631/09, § 41, 4 October 2012), have the domestic authorities at any moment taken any steps to discharge that obligation in the present case? If not, has there been a breach of the State's positive obligation to respect for the applicants" family and/or private life, as required by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?. - EGMR, 10.04.2008 - 21071/05
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR - 68163/14
Does the present application fall within the Court's competence ratione materiae, in the light of the principles established in the Court's case law (see, among other authorities, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, ECHR 2009-...; Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470/99, ECHR 2003-IV; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, 10 April 2008; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29156/09, 26 July 2011; Bochan c. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, CEDH 2015, and Kudeshkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, 17 February 2015)?.