Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17, 20143/19 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZLICIC v. SERBIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ZLICIC v. SERBIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (33)
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
According to the Court's settled case-law, ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 88, ECHR 2010; Price v. the United Kingdom, no..33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, 11 July 2006; and Z.A. and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.Indeed, the Court has previously acknowledged that, in spite of the important interests at stake in the context of Article 6, Article 3 of the Convention enshrines an absolute right (see, among other authorities, Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 99, ECHR 2006-IX).
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 21388/15
ALMASI v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
The Court reiterates that where a person raises an arguable claim or makes a credible assertion that he or she has suffered treatment contrary to Article 3 at the hands of State agents, that provision, read in conjunction with the general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in... [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation (see, among many authorities, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VIII; Labita, cited above, § 131; Bouyid, cited above, § 124; and Almasi v. Serbia, no. 21388/15, § 60, 8 October 2019).50541/08 and 3 others, § 254, 13 September 2016; and Almasi v. Serbia, no. 21388/15, § 101, 8 October 2019).
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 62798/09
ARTUR IVANOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
However, the total award of the equivalent of approximately EUR 1, 260, in view of the principles set out in the case of Shestopalov (cited above, §§ 58-63) and more recently in Artur Ivanov v. Russia (no. 62798/09, § 19, 5 June 2018), appears to be substantially less than the award the Court itself would have made given a finding of a violation of the magnitude claimed (see, for example, Antropov v. Russia, no. 22107/03, 29 January 2009, and Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 202-16, ECHR 2006-V).
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
Treatment has been held by the Court to be "inhuman" because, inter alia, it was premeditated, applied for hours at a stretch and caused either actual bodily injury or intense physical and mental suffering (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140; Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, 9 June 1998, § 34, Reports, 1998-IV; and Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 84, 1 March 2007). - EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 48044/10
BEKTASHI COMMUNITY AND OTHERS v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
48044/10 and 2 others, § 91, 12 April 2018). - EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11
Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
That is why awarding compensation to the applicant for the damage which he sustained as a result of the ill-treatment is only a part of the overall action required (see Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884/11, § 231, 7 April 2015, and Jevtovic, cited above, § 61). - EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84
FUNKE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
Finally, I cannot but note that the issues arising in the present case are closely linked to the privilege against self-incrimination and to the right to silence which are also protected by Article 6 of the Convention (see, for example, Funke v. France, 25 February 1993, § 44, Series A no. 256-A; Saunders v. the United Kingdom [GC], 17 December 1996, § 68, Reports 1996-VI; Jalloh, cited above, § 100; and Ibrahim and Others, cited above, § 267). - EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 36937/06
HAJNAL v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see, for example, Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 113, 8 April 2004; Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, § 154, 19 June 2012; and Bektashi Community and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2021 - 73313/17
While the degree of public scrutiny required may vary, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigatory procedure in all cases (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV; Krsmanovic v. Serbia, no. 19796/14, § 74, 19 December 2017; and Almasi, cited above, § 62). - EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 57519/09
RAZZAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 22107/03
ANTROPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
- EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00
ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 39270/98
BELCHEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 17332/03
LEVINTA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 29896/14
JEVTOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02
VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 2293/03
WIESER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 19796/14
KRSMANOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
- EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 27250/02
Menschrechtskonvention: Überlange Verfahrensdauer, Zivilrechtsstreit
- EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 2912/11
KOWAL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 23130/04
Menschenrechtskonvention : Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs des …
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 10044/11
GOLUBOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00
D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01
MELNIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 15983/21
HANUSA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
73313/17 and 20143/19, 26 January 2021). - EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 41394/15
PAUN JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
73313/17 and 20143/19, § 55, 26 January 2021).