Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 73352/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,9100) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUSCU v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BUSCU v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 1814/11
MARILENA-CARMEN POPA v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 73352/14
Failure of the last-instance court to examine the applicant and a large number of the witnesses 52. The Court reiterates the principles set out in its case-law where there has been a conviction of a defendant by a last-instance court after he or she was acquitted by a lower court, without the last-instance court hearing the testimony of the defendant or the other witnesses in the case (see, amongst other authorities, Marilena-Carmen Popa v. Romania, no. 1814/11, § 35, 18 February 2020, with further references, and Dan v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2), 57575/14, § 52, 10 November 2020). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 73352/14
It reiterates further that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, amongst many other authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 57575/14
DAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 73352/14
Failure of the last-instance court to examine the applicant and a large number of the witnesses 52. The Court reiterates the principles set out in its case-law where there has been a conviction of a defendant by a last-instance court after he or she was acquitted by a lower court, without the last-instance court hearing the testimony of the defendant or the other witnesses in the case (see, amongst other authorities, Marilena-Carmen Popa v. Romania, no. 1814/11, § 35, 18 February 2020, with further references, and Dan v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2), 57575/14, § 52, 10 November 2020).