Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KALFAGIANNIS AND POSPERT v. GREECE

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KALFAGIANNIS AND POSPERT v. GREECE

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13936/02

  MANOLE ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  As regards the arguments based on Article 10 of the Convention, the domestic court, referring to the Court's judgment in Manole and Others v. Moldova (no. 13936/02, ECHR 2009 (extracts)), ruled that Article 10 of the Convention did not oblige the member States to establish a public radio and television provider, as long as there were other means of ensuring the quality and balance of the programmes.

  In addition, the fact that POSPERT, a federation of trade unions, considers itself to be the guardian of the collective interests of its members - or even of the members of its members given that it unites trade unions- does not suffice to make it a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see Manole and others v. Moldova (dec.), no. 13936/02, 15 June 2004 and Purcell and others, cited above).

• EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 44818/11

  BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  The same consideration applies to associations which, according to the Court's established case-law, will normally only be granted victim status if they have been directly affected by the measure in question (see British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818/11, § 50, 15 September 2016; Association des amis de Saint Raphaël et de Fréjus et autres v. France (dec.), no. 45053/98, 29 February 2000; Dayras and Others and the association "SOS Sexisme" v. France, (dec.), no. 65390/01, 6 January 2005; and Grande Oriente d"Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani v. Italy (no.2), no. 26740/02, § 20, 31 May 2007).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that, in order for an applicant to be able to claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention, there must be a sufficiently direct link between the applicants and the harm which they consider they have sustained on account of the alleged violation (see, among other authorities, Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III).

 
• EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 65390/01

  DAYRAS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  The same consideration applies to associations which, according to the Court's established case-law, will normally only be granted victim status if they have been directly affected by the measure in question (see British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818/11, § 50, 15 September 2016; Association des amis de Saint Raphaël et de Fréjus et autres v. France (dec.), no. 45053/98, 29 February 2000; Dayras and Others and the association "SOS Sexisme" v. France, (dec.), no. 65390/01, 6 January 2005; and Grande Oriente d"Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani v. Italy (no.2), no. 26740/02, § 20, 31 May 2007).
• EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 45053/98

  L'ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE SAINT-RAPHAËL ET DE FREJUS et AUTRES REQUERANTS contre …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  The same consideration applies to associations which, according to the Court's established case-law, will normally only be granted victim status if they have been directly affected by the measure in question (see British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818/11, § 50, 15 September 2016; Association des amis de Saint Raphaël et de Fréjus et autres v. France (dec.), no. 45053/98, 29 February 2000; Dayras and Others and the association "SOS Sexisme" v. France, (dec.), no. 65390/01, 6 January 2005; and Grande Oriente d"Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani v. Italy (no.2), no. 26740/02, § 20, 31 May 2007).
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06

  NENCHEVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, § 88, 18 June 2013), even though the Court should have regard to the fact that an applicant was a party to the domestic proceedings (see Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 52, ECHR 2012; Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 48, ECHR 2009; and Bursa Barosu Baskanligi and Others v. Turkey, no. 25680/05, §§ 109-17, 19 June 2018).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  The individual concerned must be able to show that he or she was "directly affected" by the measure complained of (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, with further references, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 25680/05

  BURSA BAROSU BASKANLIGI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, § 88, 18 June 2013), even though the Court should have regard to the fact that an applicant was a party to the domestic proceedings (see Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 52, ECHR 2012; Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 48, ECHR 2009; and Bursa Barosu Baskanligi and Others v. Turkey, no. 25680/05, §§ 109-17, 19 June 2018).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 26740/02

  GRANDE ORIENTE D`ITALIA DI PALAZZO GIUSTINIANI c. ITALIE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 74435/14

  The same consideration applies to associations which, according to the Court's established case-law, will normally only be granted victim status if they have been directly affected by the measure in question (see British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818/11, § 50, 15 September 2016; Association des amis de Saint Raphaël et de Fréjus et autres v. France (dec.), no. 45053/98, 29 February 2000; Dayras and Others and the association "SOS Sexisme" v. France, (dec.), no. 65390/01, 6 January 2005; and Grande Oriente d"Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani v. Italy (no.2), no. 26740/02, § 20, 31 May 2007).

• EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 45594/19

  ASZTALOS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Finally, the Court notes that, as regards the trade unions applicants in the second and third application, their complaints are incompatible ratione personae, since they concern rights of the individual employees (Kalfagiannis and Pospert v. Greece (dec.), no. 74435/14, §§ 49-51, 9 June 2020).
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 42068/15

  ÁRUS c. ROUMANIE

  Tout en prenant compte du fait que la procédure visée dans la requête no 60930/16 a eu en définitive comme objet de vérifier le respect des dispositions légales dans le département de Harghita où habite le requérant (paragraphe 3 ci-dessus), cela n'est pas en soi suffisant pour démontrer la qualité de victime dans la mesure où l'intéressé n'a pas démontré comment il a été personnellement touché par les mesures prises par les autorités (voir, mutatis mutandis, Kalfagiannis et Pospert c. Grèce (déc.), no 74435/14, § 46, 9 juin 2020, quand à l'absence de qualité de victime en raison de l'impossibilité d'écouter ou de visionner les programmes d'un certain poste de radio et télévision).
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 37857/14

  YUSUFELI ILÇESINI GÜZELLESTIRME YASATMA KÜLTÜR VARLIKLARINI KORUMA DERNEGI v. …

  It is important to reiterate in this respect that the sole fact that a non-governmental organisation considers itself as a guardian of the collective interests of its members does not suffice to make it a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see Kalifagiannis and Prospert v. Greece (dec.), § 50, no. 74435/14, 9 June 2020).
• EGMR, 10.05.2022 - 75388/14

  OOO OZON MEDIA c. RUSSIE

  La notion de « victime'est interprétée de façon autonome et indépendante des règles de droit interne telles que l'intérêt à agir ou la qualité pour agir (Gorraiz Lizarraga et autres c. Espagne, no 62543/00, § 35, CEDH 2004-III, et Kalfagiannis et Pospert c. Grèce (déc.), no 74435/14, §§ 39 et 44-48, 9 juin 2020, avec les références qui y sont citées).
• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 20002/13

  ASSOCIAZIONE POLITICA NAZIONALE LISTA MARCO PANNELLA ET RADICALI ITALIANI c. …

  Pour les autres groupes d'intérêt, y compris les associations et mouvements politiques tels que la deuxième requérante, d'autres émissions radiotélévisées de participation à la vie culturelle et politique sont prévues: les espaces de parole et de communication (programmi dell'accesso, paragraphe 42 ci-dessus) et, plus largement, les émissions d'information (voir, mutatis mutandis, Kalfagiannis et Pospert c. Grèce, (déc.), no 74435/14, §§ 50-51, 9 juin 2020).