Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÇETINKAYA v. TÜRKIYE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ÇETINKAYA v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  REMAINING COMPLAINTS 25. Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the right to a reasoned judgment in respect of the remainder of the applicant's convictions, the principle of equality of arms as regards the admission and assessment of evidence by the courts and an alleged breach of his presumption of innocence under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08

  ATAYKAYA c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  Having regard to the documents in its possession, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 3, 000 in respect of costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant (see for the relevant principles Ataykaya v. Turkey, no. 50275/08, § 81, 22 July 2014).
• EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 59453/10

  SÜLEYMAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  The Court further reiterates that the most appropriate form of redress would be a retrial in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see Süleyman v. Turkey, no. 59453/10, § 110, 17 November 2020).

 
• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 17526/10

  GÜLCÜ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  However, the trial court failed to establish whether the applicant had been aware of those instructions or had acted in accordance with any specific instructions given by the PKK (compare also Gülcü v. Turkey, no. 17526/10, § 112, 19 January 2016).
• EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 51962/12

  ÖNER AND TÜRK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  The Court also dismisses the second limb of the Government's preliminary objection in view of its established case-law (see, among other authorities, Öner and Türk v. Turkey, no. 51962/12, §§ 14-18, 31 March 2015).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  The Court's assessment 18. The general principles concerning the right to a reasoned judgment have been summarized in Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) ([GC], no. 19867/12, § 84, 11 July 2017) and in Ayetullah Ay v. Turkey, (nos. 29084/07 and 1191/08, § 128, 27 October 2020).
• EGMR, 27.10.2020 - 29084/07

  AYETULLAH AY v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 76619/11

  The Court's assessment 18. The general principles concerning the right to a reasoned judgment have been summarized in Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) ([GC], no. 19867/12, § 84, 11 July 2017) and in Ayetullah Ay v. Turkey, (nos. 29084/07 and 1191/08, § 128, 27 October 2020).