Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LABAZNIKOV v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LABAZNIKOV v. UKRAINE

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04

  KHAYREDINOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The applicable case-law is summarised in, for example, Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II); Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (24 October 1979, § 45, Series A no. 33); Nesták v. Slovakia (no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007); and Khayredinov v. Ukraine (no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The applicable case-law is summarised in, for example, Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II); Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (24 October 1979, § 45, Series A no. 33); Nesták v. Slovakia (no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007); and Khayredinov v. Ukraine (no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case in question and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The applicable case-law is summarised in, for example, Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II); Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (24 October 1979, § 45, Series A no. 33); Nesták v. Slovakia (no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007); and Khayredinov v. Ukraine (no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings under Article 5 § 1 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see paragraphs 22 and 30 above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application, and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the other complaints mentioned above (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01

  NESTAK v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The applicable case-law is summarised in, for example, Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II); Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (24 October 1979, § 45, Series A no. 33); Nesták v. Slovakia (no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007); and Khayredinov v. Ukraine (no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 7670/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case in question and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).