Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YANCHOVICHIN v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YANCHOVICHIN c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court, as master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see, as a recent authority, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114, 20 March 2018), considers that, in the light of its case-law (see, for instance, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 123, ECHR 2005-VII), it is appropriate to examine the applicant's complaints solely under Article 3 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court's assessment 29. The Court reiterates that an applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried other remedies that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see, among other authorities, Assenov and Others, cited above, § 86, and Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III ).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court reiterates that where an individual, when taken into police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Toteva, cited above, § 50; Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-11, Series A no. 241-A; and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).

 
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court, as master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see, as a recent authority, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114, 20 March 2018), considers that, in the light of its case-law (see, for instance, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 123, ECHR 2005-VII), it is appropriate to examine the applicant's complaints solely under Article 3 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

  SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  In relation to detainees, the Court has emphasised that individuals in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect their physical well-being (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts); Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 77, 4 October 2005; and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002 IX).
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court reiterates that where an individual, when taken into police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Toteva, cited above, § 50; Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-11, Series A no. 241-A; and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03

  TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  In relation to detainees, the Court has emphasised that individuals in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect their physical well-being (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts); Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 77, 4 October 2005; and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002 IX).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  The Court has already found that the remedies available within the criminal-justice system in Bulgaria are the normal avenue of redress for alleged police ill-treatment (see Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 57, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII; Bouyid, cited above, § 83).