Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRDZALIJA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KRDZALIJA AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  The Court reiterates that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, a breach of the Convention and have provided redress (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51; see also, among many other authorities, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010; Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 35098/12, § 25, 12 February 2019).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  Even though the Government did not raise any objection in this regard, the Court has to satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case brought before it (see, mutatis mutandis, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III, and Kavaja and Miljanic v. Montenegro (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 37801/16

  RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  37801/16 and 2 others, § 156, 30 March 2021).

 
• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  The relevant principles in this regard are set out in Janowiec and Others v. Russia ([GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 140-51, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 18299/03

  Vorgehen bei Geiselnahme in Moskau verurteilt // Russland muss Hinterbliebene von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  There is nothing in the material in the Court's possession to suggest that in the present case the domestic authorities failed to secure the relevant physical or forensic evidence, or to seek out relevant witnesses or relevant information (see Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, § 271, ECHR 2011 (extracts), and Armani Da Silva, cited above, § 233).
• EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 35098/12

  CRISTEA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  The Court reiterates that an individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, a breach of the Convention and have provided redress (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51; see also, among many other authorities, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010; Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 35098/12, § 25, 12 February 2019).
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 43562/02

  KAVAJA v. MONTENEGRO

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  43562/02 and 37454/08, § 30, 23 November 2010).
• EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

  V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  Article 1 of the Convention must be considered to reflect this ordinary and essentially territorial notion of jurisdiction (see Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 206, ECHR 2010 (extracts), and Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, §§ 59-61, ECHR 2001-XII).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2023 - 79065/13

  It is reiterated, however, that the first sentence of Article 2, which ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention and also enshrines one of the basic values of the democratic societies making up the Council of Europe, enjoins the State not only to refrain from the "intentional" taking of life, but also to take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 48, ECHR 2002-I, and Ribcheva and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.