Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SATYBALOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SATYBALOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The obligation on the authorities to account for the treatment of an individual in custody is particularly stringent where that individual dies (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 141, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); and Tekin and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 83, 5 September 2017).
• EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95

  TANLI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The obligation on the authorities to account for the treatment of an individual in custody is particularly stringent where that individual dies (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 141, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); and Tekin and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 83, 5 September 2017).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  Indeed, the essential purpose of an investigation under Article 2 is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 105, 4 May 2001; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 110, ECHR 2005-VII; and Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, § 163, ECHR 2011).

 
• EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 37795/13

  TEKIN AND ARSLAN AGAINST BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The obligation on the authorities to account for the treatment of an individual in custody is particularly stringent where that individual dies (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 141, ECHR 2001-III (extracts); and Tekin and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 83, 5 September 2017).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  In the absence of such explanation, the Court can draw inferences which may be unfavourable for the Government (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 274, 18 June 2002).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into police custody in good health and is found to be injured on release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 28761/11

  Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The Court therefore considers that the unacknowledged detention of an individual is a complete negation of the fundamentally important guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention and discloses a most grave violation of that provision (see El-Masri, cited above, § 233; Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, § 529, 24 July 2014; and Belozorov v. Russia and Ukraine, no. 43611/02, § 113, 15 October 2015).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The obligation to carry out an effective investigation into allegations of treatment infringing Articles 2 and 3 suffered at the hands of State agents is well established in the Court's case-law (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229-39, ECHR 2016; El-Masri, cited above, §§ 182-85, and Mocanu and Others, cited above, §§ 316-26).
• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  The Court's assessment 89. The key purpose of Article 5 is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 73, 22 October 2018, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 30, ECHR 2006-X).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 79947/12

  This may, where appropriate, include compensation for loss of earnings, which applies to close relatives, including spouses, elderly parents and minor children (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).