Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EIGIRDAS AND VĮ "DEMOKRATIJOS PLETROS FONDAS" v. LITHUANIA

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  EIGIRDAS v. LITHUANIA and 1 other application

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (35)

• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 42461/13

  KARÁCSONY ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate concerning questions of public interest (see Bédat, cited above, § 49; Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 144, ECHR 2016 (extracts); and Falzon v. Malta, no. 45791/13, § 58, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

  A. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  It has held that in order for Article 8 to come into play, an attack on a person's reputation must attain a certain level of seriousness and in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012; Medzlis Islamske Zajednice Brcko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, § 76, 27 June 2017; A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009; Kunitsyna v. Russia, no. 9406/05, § 42, 13 December 2016; Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 117, 14 January 2020; and Balaskas, cited above, §§ 37 and 40).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 13252/17

  AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  Whilst it is true that editorial discretion is not unbounded, journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39 (a), ECHR 2003-V, and Ahmet Hüsrev Altan v. Turkey, no. 13252/17, § 214, 13 April 2021) and the methods of objective and balanced reporting may vary considerably; it is therefore not for this Court, or for the national courts, to substitute their own views for those of the press as to what reporting techniques should be adopted (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298).

 
• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 54145/10

  ERLA HLYNSDÓTTIR v. ICELAND (No. 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  Although the press must not overstep certain bounds, in particular in respect of the reputation and rights of others, its duty is nevertheless to impart, in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities, information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among other authorities, Erla HlynsdÏŒttir v. Iceland (no. 3), no. 54145/10, § 62, 2 June 2015).
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 9406/05

  KUNITSYNA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  It has held that in order for Article 8 to come into play, an attack on a person's reputation must attain a certain level of seriousness and in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012; Medzlis Islamske Zajednice Brcko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, § 76, 27 June 2017; A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009; Kunitsyna v. Russia, no. 9406/05, § 42, 13 December 2016; Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 117, 14 January 2020; and Balaskas, cited above, §§ 37 and 40).
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 28470/12

  NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  It follows that the Court needs to examine whether the interference was justified in accordance with Article 10 § 2 of the Convention, that is, whether it was "prescribed by law", whether it pursued one or more of the legitimate aims set out in that paragraph and whether it was "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve those aims (see, among other authorities, NIT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 28470/12, § 151, 5 April 2022).
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  Reiterating its view on the chilling effect that the fear of sanctions may have on the exercise of freedom of expression (see, for instance, Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII), and even though the applicants have not shown whether or not they struggled to cover those legal costs, the Court is nevertheless of the view that, under the circumstances, the sanction imposed was capable of having a chilling effect on the exercise of the applicants' right to freedom of expression (see, for instance and mutatis mutandis, Lombardo and Others v. Malta, no. 7333/06, no. 7333/06, § 61, 24 April 2007).
• EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 22350/13

  SALLUSTI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  The Court has also previously held that a newspaper cannot be exempted from the duty to exercise control over the articles published in it, and bears responsibility for their content (see, mutatis mutandis, Sallusti v. Italy, no. 22350/13, § 57, 7 March 2019).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  It has held that in order for Article 8 to come into play, an attack on a person's reputation must attain a certain level of seriousness and in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012; Medzlis Islamske Zajednice Brcko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, § 76, 27 June 2017; A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009; Kunitsyna v. Russia, no. 9406/05, § 42, 13 December 2016; Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 117, 14 January 2020; and Balaskas, cited above, §§ 37 and 40).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

  In addition, the Court reiterates that by reason of the "duties and responsibilities" inherent in the exercise of the freedom of expression, the safeguard afforded by Article 10 to journalists in relation to reporting on issues of general interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith and on an accurate factual basis, and that they provide reliable and precise information in accordance with journalistic ethics (see Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I, and Falter Zeitschriften GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 3084/07, § 37, 18 September 2012), or, in other words, in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 50, 29 March 2016).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 3084/07

  Äußerungsfreiheit von Journalisten bei Publikationen zur möglichen Befangenheit …
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 73087/17

  BALASKAS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 28032/12

  GELEVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 40597/08

  RUNGAINIS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

  JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 53139/11

  DO CARMO DE PORTUGAL E CASTRO CÂMARA v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 81624/17

  POVILONIS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 10347/10

  MIKA c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 24016/05

  EKER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 25721/04

  RUSU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 22953/16

  STANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 24919/20

  MARCINKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48009/08

  Keine Pflicht zur Vorabbenachrichtigung bei Veröffentlichung privater …
• EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 53028/14

  MONICA MACOVEI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 51107/16

  TIRIAC v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 38197/16

  GÜLEN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18

  MATALAS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03

  MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 22385/03

  KASABOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 16224/05

  REDAKTSIYA GAZETY ZEMLYAKI v. RUSSIA