Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SUPRUNENKO v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SUPRUNENKO v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  Unlike in S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008), no DNA samples were taken from the applicant.
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  The Court reiterates that the mere storage of data relating to the private life of an individual amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 8 (see Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 48, Series A no. 116).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  With regard to the question of whether or not the suspicion of illicit activity held against the applicant by the officers of the police was "reasonable" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court reiterates that a person may be detained under Article 5 § 1 (c) only in the context of criminal proceedings, for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on "reasonable suspicion" of "having committed an offence" (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000-IX).

 
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04

  LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  There is nothing in the reasoning of the domestic authorities which could be regarded as arbitrary or unreasonable, or as lacking a factual basis (see Lebedev v. Russia (dec.), no. 4493/04, 25 November 2004).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  Unlike in S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008), no DNA samples were taken from the applicant.
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 7841/08

  PERUZZO AND MARTENS v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  7841/08 and 57900/12, 4 June 2013) were far-fetched.
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5201/11

  SHER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 8630/11

  The detention of a terror suspect, even if it lasts many hours, may be compliant with Article 5 § 1 (c) (see Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, §§ 47, 51, 67, Series A no. 300-A, and Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).