Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  M.G. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 5447/03

  KOROLEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15

  Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?.
• EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 33290/96

  SALGUEIRO DA SILVA MOUTA c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15

  In support of his position, the first applicant relied on the case of Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), and E.B. v. France, ([GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 42454/02

  MENCHINSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15

  Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?.
• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 3932/02

  BATSANINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15

  Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms respected as regards the involvement of a public prosecutor in these proceedings (see Batsanina v. Russia, no. 3932/02, § 27, 26 May 2009; Korolev v. Russia (no. 2), no. 5447/03, § 33, 1 April 2010; and Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, 15 January 2009)?.
• EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

  E.B. v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 868/15

  In support of his position, the first applicant relied on the case of Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX), and E.B. v. France, ([GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008).

• VG Aachen, 30.05.2016 - 2 K 37/14

  Fahrtenbuchauflage wegen nötigenden Verhalten durch zu dichtes Auffahren

  An dieser rechtlichen Wertung hat sich auch durch die zum 1. Mai 2014 in Kraft getretenen Neuordnung des bisherigen 18-Punktesystems auf ein 8-Punktesystem im Verkehrszentralregister bis zur Entziehung einer Fahrerlaubnis gemäß § 4 Abs. 5 Satz 1 Nr. 3 StVG und der damit einhergehenden Änderung der Anlage 13 zu § 40 FeV nichts geändert, vgl. BVerwG, Urteil vom 28. Mai 2015 - 3 C 13/14 -, Rz. 21 ff. und etwa OVG NRW, Beschluss vom 13. Oktober 2015 - 868/15 - Rz. 27, jeweils juris.