Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OSMANI v. ALBANIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  OSMANI v. ALBANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 50705/11

  TODOROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  50705/11 and 6 others, § 322, 13 July 2021).
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 10899/12

  KRAVCHUK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  In the light of the procedural character of the violation found, the Court is unable to speculate about the correct amount of pecuniary damages and finds that a reopening of the domestic proceedings and a re-examination of the matter at the national level would constitute, in principle, the most appropriate means to remedy the violation (see, for similar approach, Gereksar and Others v. Turkey, nos. 34764/05 and 3 others, § 75, 1 February 2011; Kravchuk v. Russia, no. 10899/12, §§ 55-56, 26 November 2019; Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 30262/13

  PÁLKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  Given that Article 494 §(ë) of the Code of Civil Procedure provides for such possibility, an appropriate form of redress for the violation of the applicant's right would be to reopen the proceedings, should the applicant request such reopening, and to re-examine the case in a manner that is in keeping with the requirements of the Convention (see Pálka and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 30262/13, § 69, 24 March 2022, and Khizanishvili and Kandelaki, § 63, cited above).

 
• EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12

  KOSTOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  66581/12 and 25054/15, § 105, 14 May 2020; and Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 25601/12

  KHIZANISHVILI AND KANDELAKI v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  Accordingly, it was not unreasonable for the applicant to have expected full compensation for the resulting damage (compare Khizanishvili and Kandelaki v. Georgia, no. 25601/12, § 54, 17 December 2019).
• EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 10810/05

  CAUSH DRIZA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  m in the relevant zone in the context of the compensation proceedings for land expropriated during the communist regime (see Çaush Driza v. Albania, no. 10810/05, §§ 44-45, 15 March 2011), the applicant's plot was evaluated at ALL 12, 000 per sq.
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 61302/00

  BUZESCU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  It follows that those courts failed to properly engage with or provide a specific and explicit reply to the applicant's main plea, which was decisive for the outcome of the proceedings (compare Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 30, Series A no. 303-A; Buzescu v. Romania, no. 61302/00, § 67, 24 May 2005; and, for the evaluation of proportionality of interference with the right to property, Visti?†?. and Perepjolkins, §§ 111-14, and Khizanishvili and Kandelaki, §§ 58-59, both cited above).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  OTHER COMPLAINTS 30. Having regard to the facts of the case, the parties' submissions, and its findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that in the present case there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 10613/16

  SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  A general description of the expropriation procedure under the Expropriation Act (Law no. 8561 of 22 December 1999 "On Expropriations and Temporary Use of Private Property in the Public Interest") is set out in Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16, § 63, 11 January 2018).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  The general principles concerning the duty under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for a court to give reasons have been summarised in Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) ([GC], no. 19867/12, § 84, 11 July 2017).