Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 35137/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,33032) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84
BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 35137/97
If, at that time, the foreigner had been married for more than three years and had legally resided with his spouse in the Netherlands for at least one year during the time directly preceding the dissolution or breakdown of the marriage, he would be eligible for an independent residence permit (see also Eur. Court HR, Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, pp. 10-11, paras. 14-15).1 (Art. 8-1) between the applicant and his son (cf. Eur. Court HR, Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, p. 14, para. 21; and No. 12411/86, Dec. 4.3.87, D.R. 51, p. 245) and that thus the refusal of the Dutch authorities to grant the applicant a residence permit constitutes an interference with the exercise of his right to respect for family life.
- EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 35137/97
A fair balance must be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole, and in the assessment of this balance the Contracting State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (cf. Keegan v. Ireland judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, p. 19, para. 49).