Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20481/92 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,20505) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NORNEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20481/92
In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual (see e.g. Eur. Court H. R., Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 33 para. 67, and the B. v. France judgment of 25 March 1992, to be published in Series A no. 232-C para. 44). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13343/87
B. c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20481/92
In determining whether or not such an obligation exists, regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of the individual (see e.g. Eur. Court H. R., Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 33 para. 67, and the B. v. France judgment of 25 March 1992, to be published in Series A no. 232-C para. 44). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20481/92
It only applies if the individual can be said to have an "arguable claim" of a violation of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23 para. 52). - EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20481/92
Although the essential object of Article 8 (Art. 8) is to protect the individual against arbitrary interference by public authorities, there may be positive obligations inherent in an effective "respect" for family life (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R., Marckx judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 14 para. 31).