Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,28153) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95
- EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81
REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95
The applicant states that her case is different from the cases of Rees and Cossey (Eur. Court HR, Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106; Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184) because she does not seek the amendment of her birth certificate. - EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 10843/84
COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95
The applicant states that her case is different from the cases of Rees and Cossey (Eur. Court HR, Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106; Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184) because she does not seek the amendment of her birth certificate. - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13343/87
B. c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 28957/95
As regards the applicant's NI number the Government submit that, unlike in the case of B. v. France (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 1991, Series A no. 232-C), an employer is unable to establish the sex of the applicant from the NI number itself since it does not contain any encoded reference to her sex.