Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,31340) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
- EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 32819/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
As regards Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention, the Government submit that Article 13 (Art. 13) is not applicable since the application does not involve any arguable complaints of breaches of the Convention (Eur. Court HR, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131).As to the complaint under Article 13 (Art. 13), the Commission considers, in view of its reasoning above, that the applicant does not have an arguable claim as regards his complaints under Articles 6, 7 or 14 (Art. 6, 7, 14) (Eur. Court HR, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131).
- EGMR, 04.12.1979 - 7710/76
Schiesser ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
3 (Art. 5-3) ignores the requirements of that Article outlined in the Schiesser judgment (Eur. Court HR, Schiesser v. Switzerland judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34). - EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
2 or 7 (Art. 6-2, 7) of the Convention in which case Article 14 (Art. 14) of the Convention is not applicable (Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, pp. 15-16, para. 32). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
Secondly, and as to the Government's observations on the admissibility and merits of his complaints, the applicant points out, inter alia, that the Government's submission that trial within a reasonable time or release are alternatives is not sustainable in view of the Wemhoff judgment (Eur. Court HR, Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1997 - 32819/96
It is also argued that, in any event, Article 13 (Art. 13) does not go so far as to guarantee a remedy allowing a State's laws as such to be challenged before a national authority on the grounds of being contrary to the Convention, the Government citing the James and Others together with the Lithgow and Others judgments (Eur. Court HR, James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98 and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102).