Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FEHR, MÄHNER, KESSLER AND BAHTIM GASTSTÄTTEN GESMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

  ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention in matters which are not exclusively within the discretion of administrative authorities and where the Administrative Court considers the submissions on their merits, point by point, without ever having to decline jurisdiction in replying to them or ascertaining various facts (Eur. Court HR, Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 12-13, paras. 31-32).
• EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80

  BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  1 (Art. 6-1) only applies if the "right" is "civil" in character (Eur. Court HR, Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  Article 6 (Art. 6) does not in itself guarantee any particular content for "rights and obligations" in the substantive law of the Contracting States (cf. Eur. Court HR, Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 70, para. 192).

 
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  This is not the case if there is no review of the administrative decision by a judicial body that has full jurisdiction (Eur. Court HR, Obermeier v. Austria judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, pp. 22-23, paras. 69-70).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

  FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  Therefore the European Court of Human Rights constantly finds that whenever a complainant failed to make such a request, he or she must be deemed to have waived unequivocally his or her right to a hearing (Eur. Court HR, Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268, p. 14, para. 34; Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 20, para. 44; mutatis mutandis Pauger v. Austria judgment of 28 May 1997, para. 60, to be published in Reports 1997).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28866/95

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (Eur. Court HR, Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, p. 17, para. 44).