Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 30976/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,32391) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BALFOUR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 30976/96
The Commission recalls that where Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) proves to be inapplicable, Article 14 (Art. 14) of the Convention cannot be combined with it (Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23, para. 50). - EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 23576/94
E.S. c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 30976/96
The Commission, too, has held that the dismissal of a high ranking soldier was a matter where the State acted in the field of public law such that no "civil rights" were at issue (see, for example, E.S. v. Germany, No. 23576/94, Dec. 29.11.95).
- EKMR, 23.10.1997 - 33694/96
QUINN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However this was also the case in Balfour v. the United Kingdom (No. 30976/96, Dec. 2.7.97), which concerned an applicant who worked for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and was refused access to certain documents relevant to proceedings in the normal domestic courts concerning his dismissal, where the Commission nevertheless held that no "civil rights" were involved due to the public nature of his former employment.