Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KETO-TOKOI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 18 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  1 (Art. 6-1) does not oblige the Contracting States to submit disputes over civil rights to a procedure which at each stage meets the requirements of that provision, provided it eventually may be determined by a body which does (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1984, Series A no. 43, pp. 22-23, para. 51).
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86

  FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  The three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Fredin v. Sweden judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 14, para.
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90

  SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  Close relatives of a deceased applicant are in principle entitled to take his or her place in the proceedings before the Convention organs (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Scherer v. Switzerland judgment of 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287, pp. 14-15, paras. 31-32 with further references).
• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88

  HENTRICH v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

  FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 03.03.1997 - 22025/93

  1 (Art. 6-1) (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, para. 28).